Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is masking working for this variant? #59

Open
DELAMHACH opened this issue Nov 17, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Is masking working for this variant? #59

DELAMHACH opened this issue Nov 17, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@DELAMHACH
Copy link

Hi -

For the variant at 17-41256878-C-T, with or without masking, and with the Max distance >=95, SpliceAI is showing an Acceptor Gain | 0.21 | 95 bp. 95bp is the distance to the nearest native acceptor site: https://grch37.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/Location/View?db=core;g=ENSG00000012048;r=17:41256878-41256974

I am struggling to understand if this is a true gain of strength at the native acceptor or if masking is failing in this instance.

I have not yet found a second variant with this issue and have tested at least one other on a different exon without issue. However Pangolin is not showing such a gain.

VARIANT: https://spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org/#variant=17-41256878-C-T&hg=37&distance=500&mask=1&ra=0

Screenshot 2023-11-16 at 5 42 21 PM

Mostly highlighting to make sure it is not a systematic issue.

@bw2
Copy link
Collaborator

bw2 commented Nov 17, 2023

I think the donor loss score is being masked correctly because the +16bp position is not at an annotated splice site.
The masking behavior of the donor/acceptor gain scores seems inconsistent, the same as in
#58

image

Either both of them should be masked or neither of them. This appears to be a common bug for spliceai gain scores whose positions fall on the last base of an exon. I haven't yet tracked it down in the code.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants