Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discuss whether it makes sense to parametrize gnomAD resource paths #142

Open
gtiao opened this issue Dec 17, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Discuss whether it makes sense to parametrize gnomAD resource paths #142

gtiao opened this issue Dec 17, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@gtiao
Copy link
Contributor

gtiao commented Dec 17, 2020

This would allow users to supply their own local paths of gnomAD resources to our standard Python library functions, rather than rely on the hard-coded cloud references (e.g., meta.ht()).

This would likely be a large effort to revise existing functions, but we could do this if we get several requests for this functionality.

See discussion here: https://discuss.hail.is/t/hail-utilities-for-gnomad-in-local-cluster/1790

@nawatts
Copy link
Contributor

nawatts commented Dec 17, 2020

As a side effect of supporting multiple cloud providers, broadinstitute/gnomad_methods#265 also allows loading resources from arbitrary buckets / paths.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants