New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use Paperclip for attachments #88
Milestone
Comments
This was referenced Mar 1, 2012
peakpg
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 2, 2012
* Bring in initial Scenarios from Assets * Add test files * Add new fields to attachments table
This is done. |
peakpg
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 9, 2012
Can have multiple attachments, using Paperclip rather than our custom hand rolled version.
peakpg
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 10, 2012
* Bring in initial Scenarios from Assets * Add test files * Add new fields to attachments table
peakpg
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 10, 2012
Can have multiple attachments, using Paperclip rather than our custom hand rolled version.
any ETA for supporting paperclip options such as before_post_process, or even the ability to use delayed jobs for post processing? (delayed_paperclip gem doesn't work with browsercms unfortunately) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Imported from lighthouse. Original ticket at: http://browsermedia.lighthouseapp.com/projects/28481/tickets/342. Created by Tyler Rick - 2010-04-23 18:20:43 UTC
It looks like you're considering adding Paperclip support already ( #250, #207) and attachments clearly need some overhauling ( #28), so this is probably unnecessary, but I didn't see a ticket for this and thought it might be nice to have one...
The main benefits I see for using Paperclip are:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: