Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow an additional image caption (PR #269 followup) #392

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

maxim-kukushkin
Copy link

This is a follow up of the previously raised PR. That one was agreed to be merged, but had merge conflicts and seems like the author of the PR has stopped maintaining it.

The original description was:
"The attribute for title and caption are now configurable via the option array. A caption is usful to give an additional image description or provide proper attribution. This includes the XSS fix from #268"

I like the idea of having an ability to add an optional comment to the photo, as for example in my gallery I'm storing comments in JPEG's tags. They can be multi-line and are not necessarily suitable for the main title. In the original version, the title doesn't support multiple lines allowing the text to overflow.

JS is not my specialty, I just replicated the original changes, so happy to incorporate corrections/suggestions if any

@maxim-kukushkin
Copy link
Author

Any chance to have this PR reviewed and merged? The original PR has already been agreed to be merged, it was just about the merge conflicts resolution which is done here

@maxim-kukushkin maxim-kukushkin changed the title Allow an addtional image caption (PR #269 followup) Allow an additional image caption (PR #269 followup) Apr 14, 2022
@maxim-kukushkin
Copy link
Author

@brutaldesign, any thoughts about the PR? :)

…tion divs (to support backward compatibility with the previous code which allowed HTML tags)
@maxim-kukushkin
Copy link
Author

@brutaldesign, in the original PR you indicated that this change is fine to merge (#269 (comment), yeah, it was 6 years ago). Any chance it can be merged now? This PR addresses your point to base the changes on the latest code version

@maxim-kukushkin
Copy link
Author

@brutaldesign, are you still maintaining the repo, or is it abandoned?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant