Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reconsider and document design decision on specifying service faults for failable types #105

Open
sigiesec opened this issue Jun 20, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
area: idl-syntax Affecting the IDL syntax (and indirectly all generators)

Comments

@sigiesec
Copy link
Collaborator

As currently implemented, service faults are specifying along with the definition of a failable type, rather than with the operations that raises them.

The pros and cons of these approaches, and the resulting design decision, should be explicitly documented. If necessary, the IDL definition and generators should be adapted.

@sigiesec sigiesec added the area: idl-syntax Affecting the IDL syntax (and indirectly all generators) label Jun 20, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area: idl-syntax Affecting the IDL syntax (and indirectly all generators)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant