Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 9, 2019. It is now read-only.

Testnet5: Test plan created? #69

Closed
eumartinez20 opened this issue Jul 12, 2017 · 11 comments
Closed

Testnet5: Test plan created? #69

eumartinez20 opened this issue Jul 12, 2017 · 11 comments

Comments

@eumartinez20
Copy link

Hi all,

From the issue seen in the previous days #65 , it seems a complete testing plan has not been implemented and testnet5 transactions are not closely monitored.

I would like to propose a testing plan that includes a checklist with different tests and milestones.

At the least I expect to see the following testing scenarios before and after the expected hard fork:

•Is the new client interacting with all other software implementations in testnet5? (XT, BU, Core, Classic,...in all their versions?)

•Is someone mining all types (empty, over 2-4mb,...) of blocks with and without Segwit transactions? I just see blocks with a 50B reward (0.3Kb)

Please disregard if there is a testing plan already completed and I did not see it.

Let me know if it makes sense..

@jli225
Copy link

jli225 commented Jul 12, 2017

•Is the new client interacting with all other software implementations in testnet5? (XT, BU, Core, Classic,...in all their versions?)

That's not the point.

It's the minority's obligation to adjust themselves to be able to interact with the reference client perfectly.

This mailing list was created for cross-team communication.

•Is someone mining all types (empty, over 2-4mb,...) of blocks with and without Segwit

Good point. That's certainly necessary.

@eumartinez20
Copy link
Author

That's not the point.
It's the minority's obligation to adjust themselves to be able to interact with the reference client perfectly.

Sorry, I have to LOL. You can´t expect thousands of nodes to become compatible with btc1 code overnight, it will just not happen. And we still have to test what happens even if most do.

This mailing list was created for cross-team communication.

I don´t see a lot of communication in that list, maybe a good idea to advertise it or move the discussion to another channel.

@jli225
Copy link

jli225 commented Jul 12, 2017

@eumartinez20 You can LOL at the strawman. No one expected it happened overnight. However, it will happen gradually. There is enough time for Bitcoin community to change from the old reference client to the new one. Anyway, only mining nodes and merchant nodes matter. The importance of casual Raspberry Pi node only exists in the illusion created by censorship, lies and propaganda.

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.

Soon they will be forced to fight you. It's guaranteed. They are always "being forced", to harm the Bitcoin community.

@Cr4shOv3rrid3
Copy link

Cr4shOv3rrid3 commented Jul 13, 2017

how many testnets are in existence right now?
as i was the cause of issue 65 (hacked a testnet faucet website)
i wanna help getting things fixed.

i have a bit problems understanding your techy english. im used to the money world.

i often see lots of bullshit coming from developer guys because they stuck too much into their isolated bits and bytes thinking. you guys should fix that mindsets and build main consesus of better interacting with the money guys.
as this is not only classical software.

i will give you some hint. all money related part to bitcoin is just mainly processed via primitives folder. i used the tiny formats file in relation to that folder to easily hack into peoples accounts. because its the only file that connects the network to outside apis.
I'm not interested into the money. its worthless to me isolated. i just wanted to show you guys how easily this network is able to be hacked.

but this is part of the network as hacking algorithms are part of it automatically (compressors and stuff).

another thing is the OP_RETURN as this is was originally meant to act as the chain interactor pointer area.

I can't believe how dumb the people are still thinking that bitcoin is just money or just a network isolated from all other networks.

seems like even the core developers did not figure out how this tech really is meant to be.

they themselves stuck in different source files locks.

to make things short:

the main purpose of this whole tech is to dont need to use any kind of money anymore. to give people the ability to interact freely without the need to exchange anything related to money consciously.

and its coded the way to exclude every guy not ready to this mindset. a world without money.
it excludeds everyone not ready for that thinking and acting.

thats why its that much encrypted in the code itself.

just watch cs_main its from the type ccriticalsection.

the whole source code is not showing you what this type really is.
this is meta coding.

i will give you a hint:

build a folder name him cs_main put wallet.cpp and wallet.h into it and you have the key to access the lock for cs_main locks. as this is just the inner round. you need another one with the source code part from main.cpp till anonymous namespace is showing up. Just place reference to this folders hashvalue and replace it with this part of the code et voila cs_main unlocked.

if you dont know that. algorithms that are locked by it wont be processed keeping you excluded from its main purpose

@Cr4shOv3rrid3
Copy link

you know that thumb down in the originally version was meant: "gladiator will be not killed"
later it changed directions for meaning for the masses.

the same with testnet, mainnet relations.

if you really wanna understand this network fully. you need it connect to ground base thinking.
with that much safety issues programmed into it.

making the testnet to the realnet is like a guy mastering encryption thinking.

most guys would think the realnet is the realnet. what keeps this mindset of no money world safe for only the ones able to figure that out

@Cr4shOv3rrid3
Copy link

Cr4shOv3rrid3 commented Jul 13, 2017

ok now lets get to the interesting part:

the satoshi nakamoto 1 Million BTC wallet

as the whole idea of building that network were coming from the idea of getting rid of the money thinking.
1 Million BTC were stored onto one single address what points that this is

a) Millionaires network
b) a way of tax evasion (basically every crypto network is tax money)
c) storing the knowledge of himself onto that address. what points to: 1 address itself is worth 1 Million dollars

as a bitcoin address is in relation to an account. you can easily connect it to every kind of internet related account or service to open one just by registering with your e-mail adress
in other words opening an account is generating you 1 Million dollars of income channel (monthly income relates to the price of btc because of the percentage per anno storing those 1 Million dollars)

knowing this and knowhing how the flow of bits and bytes on assembly language is based on (shifting registers)

i just need to follow a core developer to getting access to his thinking.

the moment i click on comment button i will follow the guy opened that issue (eumartinez20) and connecting my mind directly to his one.

this will teach me more about his side of thinking ot help build better interaction for other people and getting the tech more accepted for the masses (maybe mostly in background but we can better interact with the people through that).

done

@opetruzel
Copy link

I think we've just been discovered by someone's pet AI.

@jgarzik
Copy link

jgarzik commented Jul 14, 2017

Closed #51 as that specific issue was resolved by circumstance; leaving this open for more test plan discussions.

@eumartinez20
Copy link
Author

Is there a testing plan already so we can add testing recommendations, new tests and keep track of tests performed and their outcome?

@dtebbs
Copy link

dtebbs commented Jul 17, 2017

I'd also appreciate some kind of plan for testing. As someone not intimately familiar with the normal testing processes, it would be great to have some direction to make sure I'm getting the most value out of time spent testing. (Apologies if I've missed something I should have seen already)

@jgarzik jgarzik closed this as completed Oct 4, 2017
@eumartinez20
Copy link
Author

Still not clear to me if there is a test plan, and giving the latest commits it would be wise to do extensive testing.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants