Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Invoices list: Remove icon indicator for onchain #2240

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 10, 2021

Conversation

dennisreimann
Copy link
Member

As discussed on the chat the icon feels unnecessary and isn't clear to users. Leaving it off and only indicating Lightning transactions avoids confusion.

As [discussed on the chat](https://chat.btcpayserver.org/btcpayserver/pl/tcjy5ornhbd8i8jm4yj9y3maie) the icon feels unnecessary and isn't clear to users. Leaving it off and only indicating Lightning transactions avoids confusion.
Copy link
Member

@Kukks Kukks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

code ACK

concept...meh? I don't know. Why should LN be given preferential treatment for a quick overview of payment method?

@dennisreimann
Copy link
Member Author

@Kukks There's a bit more context and discussion in the linked chat – TL;DR onchain is considered "normal", because that's what most merchants have enabled, whereas LN is regarded as an add-on. In addition to that the onchain icon/emoji wasn't very clear and rather confusing, that's why just omitting it seemed like the best option.

@NicolasDorier
Copy link
Member

I agree that the icon was confusing, it confused me, I thought it was a clickable link at first...

@NicolasDorier NicolasDorier merged commit 776825c into btcpayserver:master Feb 10, 2021
@dennisreimann dennisreimann deleted the onchain-symbol branch February 15, 2021 10:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants