-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Autocomplete with select #222
Comments
As #121 suggests, there is a need for a select component with more powerful abilities while keeping the current autocomplete features like templating and searching. Making a generic Regarding your issue , I think you can already simulate a select with a |
@LusenkoSasha It's just like @Tirke said about autocomplete component |
👍 for this feature |
Would love select with autocomplete features as well |
@Tirke Could you please make a fiddle or just tell me how you'd simulate select+search with |
I'm sorry I don't have a lot of time to provide a fiddle, but basically you juste use This is not at all a fully featured select but you'll have something working. If you want something more useful I highly suggest looking at |
The only other feature I would want for the current autocomplete is the ability to have the results show when the person hasn't typed anything. Show all the data just sorted alphabetically. Currently, this same result can be achieved by just putting in a letter that doesn't fit any of the data. However, I would like this just on focus. |
@johnpyp We are working on it! |
Good to hear! Not a super big deal, but it would be a great feature :)
…On Jan 25, 2018 7:48 AM, "Walter Tommasi" ***@***.***> wrote:
@johnpyp <https://github.com/johnpyp> We are working on it!
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#222 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATq45ExluZYQvfSoiGLUZlnax1eOVPbwks5tOHgDgaJpZM4OtaP_>
.
|
@Tirke of course there's components that has this feature around the web, but we are using buefy for a reason, right? Buefy components have the look and feel that we seek in bulma and we follow all the patterns of buefy components (same attributes, the b-field "integration", etc...). It sucks using vue-multiselect with buefy forms.. it breaks the form since it has a different stylesheet (and "feel"), we can't integrate our variables with it, and it doesn't even have SASS to customize it, there's not the state classes, icons, etc... it's a pain every time. And I think the current b-select might as well just be improved to support this functionality |
Yeah, of course in an ideal world Providing a good multiselect component is hard, and time consuming. Just look at And about using |
You can now use autocomplete with |
Awesome! Thanks. |
I would also like this. @rafaelpimpa that is a good solution but it doesn't work for multiselect. |
@aantn there is tagsinput |
Hi @jtommy , thank you for the fast response. I've tried using tagsinput but it isn't appropriate for my use case. The user can choose many tags and displaying all the chosen tags takes up too much space on the screen. A UI like multi-select works better because the chosen tags are shown only when opening the multi-select. I would be happy to open a PR for this myself, but I would like some direction on how to handle it. Should this be an extension of multi-select? Should it be part of dropdown? Should it be part of autocomplete? |
Can you make an example? |
Ok, but what's the problem with tag? I need an example of UI/UX |
Just to clarify, that dropdown is only shown when the users clicks on the filter menu. |
Ok, then the dropdown multiple is the best option for you |
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: