Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: eliminate differentiation between event types #292

Closed
buehler opened this issue Sep 19, 2021 Discussed in #281 · 2 comments
Closed

feat: eliminate differentiation between event types #292

buehler opened this issue Sep 19, 2021 Discussed in #281 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@buehler
Copy link
Owner

buehler commented Sep 19, 2021

Remove the specific calls to created/updated/not-modified

Discussed in #281

Originally posted by buehler September 9, 2021
A question that rose from #279.

Is it required, that one can differentiate between "created" and "updated" during reconciliation?

When I first started the project, I thought it is required to tell those events apart. But then considering the intended way and operator works, then the difference does not matter. In "all" cases (created, updated, and not-modified), the operator should check the current state and compare it to the desired state in the entity. If something changes, the operator should apply changes to ensure the desired state again.

Furthermore, I'd like to question the usefulness of the "requeue in" feature when returning a result in a reconciliation function. When the requeue time-delay is bigger than the watcher timeout (currently 60s), then it could lead to piled up events (like described in #280). Maybe, there should be a check if the returned timespan is bigger than the configured watcher timeout. Because when the watcher terminates and recreates, all entities trigger an event again (most likely, a not modified one).

@buehler buehler added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 19, 2021
buehler added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 20, 2021
This closes #292.

BREAKING CHANGE: This removes the separat methods
for "created", "updated", and "not modified" events.
Those events are combined into one event "reconcile".
According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_loop,
this is considered good practice. To migrate, remove
all references to the mentioned events and replace
them with one call to "reconcileasync".
buehler added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 20, 2021
This closes #292.

BREAKING CHANGE: This removes the separat methods
for "created", "updated", and "not modified" events.
Those events are combined into one event "reconcile".
According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_loop,
this is considered good practice. To migrate, remove
all references to the mentioned events and replace
them with one call to "reconcileasync".

Signed-off-by: Christoph Bühler <cbuehler@rootd.ch>
buehler added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 20, 2021
This closes #292.

BREAKING CHANGE: This removes the separat methods
for "created", "updated", and "not modified" events.
Those events are combined into one event "reconcile".
According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_loop,
this is considered good practice. To migrate, remove
all references to the mentioned events and replace
them with one call to "reconcileasync".
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 6.0.0-prerelease.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

buehler added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 11, 2021
This closes #292.

BREAKING CHANGE: This removes the separat methods
for "created", "updated", and "not modified" events.
Those events are combined into one event "reconcile".
According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_loop,
this is considered good practice. To migrate, remove
all references to the mentioned events and replace
them with one call to "reconcileasync".
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 6.0.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant