Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Timeout : return an error compatible with os.IsTimeout() #118

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

maitredede
Copy link

Like *net.Conn.Read() or *os.File.Read() when a timeout occurs, return an error that can be checked with os.IsTimeout()

@maitredede
Copy link
Author

The actual behavior is "return 0 without error", that can also be understood as "end of stream". Network connections and file reads have their own timeout errors that can be detected with os.IsTimeout().

@zeroZshadow
Copy link

This is exactly the issue i'm running into. I'm using io.ReadFull to fill a buffer directly from the port. However if a timeout is hit due to misconfiguration, it will loop forever.
Thanks for fixing this!

@cmaglie cmaglie added the 2.0 Breaking changes scheduled for v2.0 release label Nov 25, 2022
@quite
Copy link
Contributor

quite commented May 6, 2024

@maitredede do you have time to rebase this?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think case Timeout:; return "Timeout" should also be added before default: (bcaab3f#diff-ad4fb56affb62e9f5024c32ea8a857376661813e1bc22b7dfef64f21ff16c34fR176)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@quite
Copy link
Contributor

quite commented May 6, 2024

@maitredede i you don't have time, i think i can take over with a new PR (keeping you as author of course).

@maitredede
Copy link
Author

Hello @quite, I have rebased/updated 😃

@quite
Copy link
Contributor

quite commented May 7, 2024

@maitredede great! I hope @cmaglie will get some time to look over this and merge it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2.0 Breaking changes scheduled for v2.0 release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants