Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add flag to skip Contains() check in bytestream.Write if file is small. #6358

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 11, 2024

Conversation

jdhollen
Copy link
Member

@jdhollen jdhollen commented Apr 11, 2024

When writes are small, traces look like this:
image
small writes (which are most writes) should get a 75% drop in latency, and current AlreadyExists rates imply this shouldn't increase load.

Related issues: N/A

@jdhollen jdhollen force-pushed the jh/2024-04-10_write-missing branch 2 times, most recently from 405e879 to d42b7d0 Compare April 11, 2024 19:55
@jdhollen jdhollen force-pushed the jh/2024-04-10_write-missing branch from d42b7d0 to aa8d322 Compare April 11, 2024 20:09
@jdhollen jdhollen marked this pull request as ready for review April 11, 2024 20:12
@jdhollen jdhollen merged commit f70ede7 into master Apr 11, 2024
17 of 18 checks passed
@jdhollen jdhollen deleted the jh/2024-04-10_write-missing branch April 11, 2024 21:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants