Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Notes on custom restriction type #218

Open
CBenghi opened this issue Nov 21, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Notes on custom restriction type #218

CBenghi opened this issue Nov 21, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
nextversion Issues that are worth keeping open, but we postpone for re-evaluation in future versions.

Comments

@CBenghi
Copy link
Contributor

CBenghi commented Nov 21, 2023

If in the long term we would need to implement a custom restriction entity, we should start from the evaluation of its components in

https://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-xmlschema11-2-20120405/datatypes.html#defn-coss

The benefits that we would start seeking are:

  • uncontrolled nested entities
  • make basetype optional
  • clarify or remove complex user cases: e.g. UNION and LIST
@CBenghi CBenghi added the nextversion Issues that are worth keeping open, but we postpone for re-evaluation in future versions. label Nov 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
nextversion Issues that are worth keeping open, but we postpone for re-evaluation in future versions.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@CBenghi