pass-the_container_may_be_indirect, should it really pass?

[I-Sokolov]

The IDS requires partOf with relation="IfcRelContainedInSpatialStructure".

In the IFC mode the beam is aggregated into slab and slab is contained in space.

As documentation says, "only the specified relation type should be considered (also recursively)" - the beam does not fit to this requirement.

Semantically it should, so I assume documentation needs special case and clarification for spatial containment.

[CBenghi]

Hi @I-Sokolov,
you are right, we need to change this test to be a fail.
Probably also add another leaving the relation empty and that should be a pass (on the same IFC file).

[CBenghi]

@atomczak,
you are also right we that we need to add another test case for multiple relations of the same type.