New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lighten doc examples by using bobo rather than ZEO #351
Conversation
To make the tests more lightweight, because bobo is much smaller. To allow people without the ability to build extensions to follow along.
IDK why this didn't break tests before. :/
…sts ran, given some of the synamic test activation
LGTM overall. I would probably edit out the make-hating path integral via |
But I love to hate make :) But to make you happy.... Hm, what is this squash option... |
Thanks. Missed that the button was also a pulldown (I hate make ;) |
|
||
.. [#gcc] Currently, this example requires the ability to build | ||
Python extensions and requires access to development tools. | ||
characters as in ``bobo <3``, so they're separated by newlines. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is that an intentional ❤️? ;)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not consciously :) If I'd noticed it, I would have fixed the usage above too. :)
Two main reasons:
People can follow examples without needing a compiler
Make these tests run less slowly.
I considered using fake examples, but I think it's good that people can try the examples and have them work.
I took a stab toward enabling parallel execution using layers, but gave up, but I plan to circle back, because the buildout tests take too long to run.