Fixes based on addition of acceptable-values

Signed-off-by: Anthony Emengo <aemengo@vmware.com>

0000-template.md

@@ -3,8 +3,7 @@
 - Name: (fill in the feature name: My Feature)
 - Start Date: (fill in today's date: YYYY-MM-DD)
 - Author(s): (Github usernames)
-<!-- Acceptable values: Approved, On Hold, Draft` -->
-- Status: Draft
+- Status: Draft <!-- Acceptable values: Approved, On Hold, Draft -->
 - RFC Pull Request: (leave blank)
 - CNB Pull Request: (leave blank)
 - CNB Issue: (leave blank)

merge-rfc.sh

@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ TARGET=${SOURCE//0000/$(printf "%04d" "${ID}")}
 
 sed -i '' "s|- RFC Pull Request:.*|- RFC Pull Request: [rfcs#${PR}](https://github.com/buildpacks/rfcs/pull/${PR})|" "${SOURCE}"
 sed -i '' "s|- CNB Issue:.*|- CNB Issue: $issues|" "${SOURCE}"
-sed -i '' "s,- Status:.*,- Status: **Approved** | On Hold," "${SOURCE}"
+sed -i '' "s|- Status:.*|- Status: Approved|" "${SOURCE}"
 git mv "${SOURCE}" "${TARGET}"
 git add "${TARGET}"
 git commit --signoff --message "RFC ${ID}

text/0000-add-status-field.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 - Name: Add Status to RFC Metadata
 - Start Date: 2021-07-14
 - Author(s): @aemengo, @ekcasey
-- Status: Approved | On Hold
+- Status: Draft <!-- Acceptable values: Approved, On Hold, Draft -->
 - RFC Pull Request: (leave blank)
 - CNB Pull Request: (leave blank)
 - CNB Issue: (leave blank)
@@ -30,30 +30,31 @@ This RFC formally introduces the **"On Hold"** status for an RFC, in a way that'
 A new `Status:` field in the `Meta` section of the RFC template. See [#meta](#meta) for example.
 
 The acceptable values are distinguished in the following ways:
+- **Draft**: The Core team has not yet approved the RFC. Edits are still being made.
 - **Approved**: The Core team has approved the RFC and is accepting PRs for its implementation.
 - **On Hold**: The Core team has approved the RFC, but PRs are currently not being accepted for its implementation. A reason must be provided in the RFC.
 
-The `Status:` field does not intend to reflect states that are already implied by the RFC process. Examples including: *Draft*, *In Review*, *Closed*, etc.
+The `Status:` field does not intend to reflect states that are already implied by the RFC process. Examples including: *In Review*, *Closed*, etc.
 
 # How it Works
 [how-it-works]: #how-it-works
 
 We will add the following to the RFC `Meta` section template:
 
 ```
-- Status: Approved | On Hold
+- Status: Draft <!-- Acceptable values: Approved, On Hold, Draft -->
 ```
 
 When an RFC is approved, the [../merge-rfc.sh](../merge-rfc.sh) script reflects the change like so:
 
 ```
-- Status: **Approved** | On Hold
+- Status: Approved
 ```
 
 When an RFC is put on hold (_via Pull Request_) then change is reflected like so:
 
 ```
-- Status: Approved | **On Hold**
+- Status: On Hold
 ```
 
 # Drawbacks