New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ha Bridge 4.5.6 not detected by Alexa App, Show or on http://alexa.amazon.com #681
Comments
i had the same problem, i had to rollback to 3.5.x after that everything worked fine again. |
I have already tried 3.5.1 and still didn't work for me |
You will need to turn some debug on, please review this trouble shooting item and post your log afterwords https://github.com/bwssytems/ha-bridge/wiki/Trouble-Shooting#q-echo-or-google-home-does-not-discover-my-ha-bridge |
Just want to make sure you have a physical Echo, Dot or Tap, not just the app? |
I have the Echo Show - the new echo with a screen which I am using to discover the device. I will get the logs soon. |
I'll need to you to turn in that Trace up listed in the link above. They may have changed something in the show. |
Here, Also is there a basic requirement that detection has to be through a physical device? I have tried all three Echo Show, Alexa app and Web |
Maybe this could help someone here. I just tried migrating from 3.5.1 to 4.5.6 and wanted to start from scratch as somehow Alexa has been very slow to respond to any hue command as I have been accumulating a lot of redundant devices (double discovered after an upgrade). I also tried moving my bridge from one VM to another and encountered this: On the new VM, neither 3.5.1 nor 4.5.6 would discover the devices properly. When discovering from the Echo, it would sound like the devices were discovered as the number of devices in the response is correct (ie 59) but when I go into the echo app I see only 12 (all my non bridge devices). I went back to my old VM and did the same thing but all devices discovered properly. The only difference I can see between the 2 VMs is the network setup was missing the Broadcast address under /etc/network/interfaces (I am on ubuntu) |
@umarally What devices did you add to your system? The logs show there are no devices configured. That is not the same as having systems configured in the bridge control tab. |
@shannonmcmurtrey What is your specific issue? Your log shows something communicating with the ha-bridge. |
i added some rf switches like Eteckcity ones. I can control those from the ha-bridge page. |
@umarally What is the IP address of your Amazon Show? |
@shannonmcmurtrey Which Alexa device do you have? And what is it's IP address? |
192.168.1.20 |
@umarally Bad news for you, it looks like they did not implement the local hue api search for the Show. There are never any upnp requests in your log for that IP. You may have to buy an echo dot to get that functionality. |
@shannonmcmurtrey You'll need to investigate the bridge control tab settings for upnp config address and that your network is allowing the upnp requests to flow from the wifi devices. |
HI @bwssytems on the description page for Echo Show it says "Ask Alexa to show you the front door or monitor the baby's room with compatible cameras from Ring and Arlo. Turn on lights, control thermostats and more with WeMo, Philips Hue, ecobee, and other compatible smart home devices." Since Philips Hue is mentioned and I thought the Ha Bridge mimicks a hue Bridge so it should be discovered. Just trying all the options that could resolve this. |
@umarally Then there must be something preventing your show from sending upnp broadcasts as the request does not show up in your log for that ip. |
yes, I noticed that as well. I have unblocked UNPN request on my router. Any other ideas where I can look to unblock this ? |
I have no other ideas without seeing your whole network setup. Any news on this |
so I bought a Echo Dot and it worked perfectly with that. Thanks I am closing this. |
That is unfortunate then. The Show must not do the discovery.... |
3.5.1 works fine for me but 4,5.6 is not been detected this is so weird. |
I had an issue with devices not being discovered. In my case, changing the Upnp address from localhost to the specific IP resolved the issue. |
I have upgraded to 5.0 and I can't find devices. I removed all my devices and added just one for this test. I know uPNP works because all my ip cameras are detectable. I am trying with the website and a show. I will try with an dot next. Its very odd. The upnp address is the IP of the machine so that is confirmed as well. Any other ideas? |
Are you also using web port 80, it is default unless overridden. |
Yes I am using port 80. I believe I was using port 80 prior but I could be wrong. Is there a way to change ports for the UPNP? I noticed the response port is set to 5000. Thanks! |
try with a echo dot. Echo show was not detecting my devices over UNPN |
How does one override the UPNP port? |
I changed the port on Apache to 80 and it doesn't work - this is with an echo show. I will try when I go upstairs on a dot. Seems odd that one would work vs another?! |
I tried with an echo dot, didn't work. I tried with two different Shows. I was concerned about being in different subnets although my subnet is set to 255.255.0.0 in DHCP. I setup a reservation in the DHCP server so I confirmed that this Echo Show and my server are all in the same class C of 192.168.1.x |
What ports have you tried?
Every dream is a goal with a date on it; if you can conceive it believe
it, you can achieve it. Don't let anyone steal your dream. Make the
decision to take a positive attitude, take pride in yourself and what you
do, work hard and stay with it. A mind is a terrible thing to waste.
"I felt bad because I couldn't wheelie; until I met a man with no bicycle"
"You are young at any age... if you are planning on tomorrow"
…On Nov 27, 2017 1:07 PM, "heffneil" ***@***.***> wrote:
I have upgraded to 5.0 and I can't find devices. I removed all my devices
and added just one for this test. I know uPNP works because all my ip
cameras are detectable. I am trying with the website and a show. I will try
with an dot next. Its very odd. The upnp address is the IP of the machine
so that is confirmed as well. Any other ideas?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#681 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AV9KHMiBEHVFXy9NfRuw7GRRaYaC1pc0ks5s6voHgaJpZM4OJxh7>
.
|
What ports? I didn’t change them just moved the service (Apache) blocking it.
Thanks,
Neil H.
…Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 28, 2017, at 7:55 AM, michaelhinchey ***@***.***> wrote:
What ports have you tried?
Every dream is a goal with a date on it; if you can conceive it believe
it, you can achieve it. Don't let anyone steal your dream. Make the
decision to take a positive attitude, take pride in yourself and what you
do, work hard and stay with it. A mind is a terrible thing to waste.
"I felt bad because I couldn't wheelie; until I met a man with no bicycle"
"You are young at any age... if you are planning on tomorrow"
On Nov 27, 2017 1:07 PM, "heffneil" ***@***.***> wrote:
> I have upgraded to 5.0 and I can't find devices. I removed all my devices
> and added just one for this test. I know uPNP works because all my ip
> cameras are detectable. I am trying with the website and a show. I will try
> with an dot next. Its very odd. The upnp address is the IP of the machine
> so that is confirmed as well. Any other ideas?
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#681 (comment)>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AV9KHMiBEHVFXy9NfRuw7GRRaYaC1pc0ks5s6voHgaJpZM4OJxh7>
> .
>
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
So today I tried it again just now. I did the search from the Alexa website and it found them! BTW i do run apache and have always run apache on port 80 and it has never been a problem. I have NO idea why it works today because the other day I had tried from the website and it didn't find them. Very very strange but for today its working! |
hi guy how do you run ha bridge on port 80 mine is se to run or start with a batch file |
Everything was working fine until i migrated to 5.2? Now none of my x10 devices are found with my dots. Any ideas? |
HI,
I have been trying to detect the Ha bridge (Which is detected by Hue App on my IOS) using Alexa but it doesn't discover the devices. I have tried it on multiple ports like 80,8080 etc. I have tried reinstalling raspbian on RPI3 multiple times and doing the setup again. I am able to access Ha bridge and control through : from any other device on my network but Alexa always gives me the same result, No device found
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: