Improve language in docs & product

[liujiajun]

I love the product. However, the language in docs & product is sometimes awkward and/or contains grammar mistakes. While it does not affect understanding, I believe it is something that can be improved upon.

Some examples are:

• It is not clear to me why three tenses are used here ("bookkeeping", "scan", & "detects")

• Is "project" countable? The usage is not consistent between the first sentence and the second and third. Also, A "project" is not comparable with a "project concept".

I think the accumulation of details like these could affect how the product is overall perceived. Adding a dedicated writing style guide could be helpful (like the Apple Publications Style Guide).

[tianzhou]

Thanks for raising this. The first problem is an unfortunate, we just updated the website.

Bytebase project is similar to the project concept in other common dev tools.

This was intended, another way to write is "The Bytebase project concept is similar to the project concept in other common dev tools." However, that is less terse.

Adding a dedicated writing style guide could be helpful (like the Apple Publications Style Guide).

We are always aspiring to great technical writing.

For Bytebase, we just started to build the technical writing guideline (we did include Apple's document as a primary reference. There is still a long way to go.

Please feel free to raise issues if you find more issues.