Fix ref.func forward-declared function check #2099
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
victoryang00
pushed a commit
to victoryang00/wamr-aot-gc-checkpoint-restore
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2024
When ref.func opcode refers to a function whose function index no smaller than current function, the destination func should be forward-declared: it is declared in the table element segments, or is declared in the export list.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When
ref.funcopcode refers to a function whose function index no smaller thancurrent function, the destination function should be forward-declared: it is declared
in the table element segments, or is declared in the export list.