Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

core/iwasm/interpreter/wasm_loader.c: remove an extra validation #2845

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 1, 2023

Conversation

yamt
Copy link
Collaborator

@yamt yamt commented Dec 1, 2023

  • Empty names are spec-wise valid.

  • As we ignore unknown custom sections anyway, it's safe to accept empty names here.

  • Currently, the problem is not exposed on our CI because the wabt version used there is a bit old.

* Empty names are spec-wise valid.

* As we ignore unknown custom sections anyway, it's safe to accept
  empty names here.

* Currently, the problem is not exposed on our CI because the wabt
  version used there is a bit old.
@wenyongh wenyongh merged commit 73914ca into bytecodealliance:main Dec 1, 2023
385 checks passed
victoryang00 pushed a commit to victoryang00/wamr-aot-gc-checkpoint-restore that referenced this pull request May 27, 2024
…ecodealliance#2845)

* Empty names are spec-wise valid.
* As we ignore unknown custom sections anyway, it's safe to
  accept empty names here.
* Currently, the problem is not exposed on our CI because
   the wabt version used there is a bit old.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants