Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump third_party/pigweed/repo from 834e876 to 7d7e7ad #4

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jun 13, 2022

Bumps third_party/pigweed/repo from 834e876 to 7d7e7ad.

Commits
  • 7d7e7ad roll: host_tools
  • 23839d3 roll: gn
  • f2559df roll: ninja
  • b5737d4 roll: cmake
  • 271e79b pw_doctor: Improve deleted file error message
  • 688f803 pw_sys_io: Improve CMake support
  • 2f9247f pw_rpc: Remove the default abandon() implementation
  • 88ee2e6 pw_rpc: Make service/method ID private in the Java APIs
  • 2c81a83 docs: Correct commit summary length guidlines
  • fd7c677 pw_protobuf: Don't encode fields with default (zero) values
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [third_party/pigweed/repo](https://github.com/google/pigweed) from `834e876` to `7d7e7ad`.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/google/pigweed/releases)
- [Commits](google/pigweed@834e876...7d7e7ad)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: third_party/pigweed/repo
  dependency-type: direct:production
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Jun 13, 2022
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jun 20, 2022

Superseded by #6.

@dependabot dependabot bot closed this Jun 20, 2022
@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/submodules/third_party/pigweed/repo-7d7e7ad branch June 20, 2022 03:25
bzbarsky-apple pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2022
It's not safe to access line editing state from the IO thread while
inside readline() on the main thread.

Remove the code that attempts to redraw readline after printing logs.
This avoids segfaults during logging at the cost of those logs
overwriting the prompt (this is not trivial to fix as readline
is a blocking API).

==================
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=63005)
  Write of size 1 at 0x55f81c7745ff by main thread:
    #0 InteractiveStartCommand::ParseCommand(char*) ../../examples/chip-tool/commands/interactive/InteractiveCommands.cpp:127 (chip-tool+0x874911)
    #1 InteractiveStartCommand::RunCommand() ../../examples/chip-tool/commands/interactive/InteractiveCommands.cpp:85 (chip-tool+0x874594)
    #2 CHIPCommand::StartWaiting(std::chrono::duration<unsigned int, std::ratio<1l, 1000l> >) ../../examples/chip-tool/commands/common/CHIPCommand.cpp:408 (chip-tool+0x83e478)
    #3 CHIPCommand::Run() ../../examples/chip-tool/commands/common/CHIPCommand.cpp:187 (chip-tool+0x83c839)
    #4 Commands::RunCommand(int, char**, bool) ../../examples/chip-tool/commands/common/Commands.cpp:147 (chip-tool+0x85d4f7)
    #5 Commands::Run(int, char**) ../../examples/chip-tool/commands/common/Commands.cpp:51 (chip-tool+0x85c288)
    #6 main <null> (chip-tool+0x569c0a)

  Previous read of size 1 at 0x55f81c7745ff by thread T5 (mutexes: write M185):
    #0 LoggingCallback ../../examples/chip-tool/commands/interactive/InteractiveCommands.cpp:46 (chip-tool+0x874479)
    #1 chip::Logging::LogV(unsigned char, unsigned char, char const*, __va_list_tag*) ../../src/lib/support/logging/CHIPLogging.cpp:221 (chip-tool+0x8ee4dc)
    #2 chip::Logging::Log(unsigned char, unsigned char, char const*, ...) ../../src/lib/support/logging/CHIPLogging.cpp:172 (chip-tool+0x8ee30a)
    #3 chip::app::ReadClient::RefreshLivenessCheckTimer() <null> (chip-tool+0x8b1746)
    #4 chip::app::ReadClient::ProcessSubscribeResponse(chip::System::PacketBufferHandle&&) ../../src/app/ReadClient.cpp:845 (chip-tool+0x8b20ec)
    #5 chip::app::ReadClient::OnMessageReceived(chip::Messaging::ExchangeContext*, chip::PayloadHeader const&, chip::System::PacketBufferHandle&&) ../../src/app/ReadClient.cpp:409 (chip-tool+0x8ae2a4)
    #6 chip::Messaging::ExchangeContext::HandleMessage(unsigned int, chip::PayloadHeader const&, chip::BitFlags<chip::Messaging::MessageFlagValues, unsigned int>, chip::System::PacketBufferHandle&&) <null> (chip-tool+0xa0517a)
    #7 operator()<chip::Messaging::ExchangeContext> ../../src/messaging/ExchangeMgr.cpp:219 (chip-tool+0xa08c73)
    #8 Call ../../src/lib/support/Pool.h:126 (chip-tool+0xa0912d)
    #9 chip::internal::HeapObjectList::ForEachNode(void*, chip::Loop (*)(void*, void*)) ../../src/lib/support/Pool.cpp:127 (chip-tool+0x8ee05a)
    #10 ForEachActiveObject<chip::Messaging::ExchangeManager::OnMessageReceived(const chip::PacketHeader&, const chip::PayloadHeader&, const chip::SessionHandle&, chip::SessionMessageDelegate::DuplicateMessage, chip::System::PacketBufferHandle&&)::<lambda(auto:2*)> > ../../src/lib/support/Pool.h:396 (chip-tool+0xa08d10)
    #11 chip::Messaging::ExchangeManager::OnMessageReceived(chip::PacketHeader const&, chip::PayloadHeader const&, chip::SessionHandle const&, chip::SessionMessageDelegate::DuplicateMessage, chip::System::PacketBufferHandle&&) ../../src/messaging/ExchangeMgr.cpp:212 (chip-tool+0xa07e91)
    #12 chip::SessionManager::SecureUnicastMessageDispatch(chip::PacketHeader const&, chip::Transport::PeerAddress const&, chip::System::PacketBufferHandle&&) ../../src/transport/SessionManager.cpp:616 (chip-tool+0xa1548b)
    #13 chip::SessionManager::OnMessageReceived(chip::Transport::PeerAddress const&, chip::System::PacketBufferHandle&&) ../../src/transport/SessionManager.cpp:443 (chip-tool+0xa14426)
    #14 chip::TransportMgrBase::HandleMessageReceived(chip::Transport::PeerAddress const&, chip::System::PacketBufferHandle&&) ../../src/transport/TransportMgrBase.cpp:76 (chip-tool+0xa17dfa)
    #15 chip::Transport::Base::HandleMessageReceived(chip::Transport::PeerAddress const&, chip::System::PacketBufferHandle&&) ../../src/transport/raw/Base.h:102 (chip-tool+0xb19728)
    #16 chip::Transport::UDP::OnUdpReceive(chip::Inet::UDPEndPoint*, chip::System::PacketBufferHandle&&, chip::Inet::IPPacketInfo const*) ../../src/transport/raw/UDP.cpp:122 (chip-tool+0xb1a48b)
    #17 chip::Inet::UDPEndPointImplSockets::HandlePendingIO(chip::BitFlags<chip::System::SocketEventFlags, unsigned char>) ../../src/inet/UDPEndPointImplSockets.cpp:688 (chip-tool+0xb00aa0)
    #18 chip::Inet::UDPEndPointImplSockets::HandlePendingIO(chip::BitFlags<chip::System::SocketEventFlags, unsigned char>, long) ../../src/inet/UDPEndPointImplSockets.cpp:569 (chip-tool+0xafff89)
    #19 chip::System::LayerImplSelect::HandleEvents() ../../src/system/SystemLayerImplSelect.cpp:406 (chip-tool+0xb07563)
    #20 chip::DeviceLayer::Internal::GenericPlatformManagerImpl_POSIX<chip::DeviceLayer::PlatformManagerImpl>::_RunEventLoop() ../../src/include/platform/internal/GenericPlatformManagerImpl_POSIX.ipp:181 (chip-tool+0x98a227)
    #21 chip::DeviceLayer::PlatformManager::RunEventLoop() ../../src/include/platform/PlatformManager.h:362 (chip-tool+0x988f75)
    #22 chip::DeviceLayer::Internal::GenericPlatformManagerImpl_POSIX<chip::DeviceLayer::PlatformManagerImpl>::EventLoopTaskMain(void*) ../../src/include/platform/internal/GenericPlatformManagerImpl_POSIX.ipp:205 (chip-tool+0x98a87c)

  Location is global '(anonymous namespace)::gIsCommandRunning' of size 1 at 0x55f81c7745ff (chip-tool+0x000000c485ff)

  Mutex M185 (0x55f81c776180) created at:
    #0 pthread_mutex_lock ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:4240 (libtsan.so.0+0x4f30a)
    #1 chip::DeviceLayer::Internal::GenericPlatformManagerImpl_POSIX<chip::DeviceLayer::PlatformManagerImpl>::_LockChipStack() ../../src/include/platform/internal/GenericPlatformManagerImpl_POSIX.ipp:78 (chip-tool+0x989e90)
    #2 chip::DeviceLayer::PlatformManager::LockChipStack() ../../src/include/platform/PlatformManager.h:410 (chip-tool+0x988fa5)
    #3 chip::DeviceLayer::Internal::GenericPlatformManagerImpl_POSIX<chip::DeviceLayer::PlatformManagerImpl>::_RunEventLoop() ../../src/include/platform/internal/GenericPlatformManagerImpl_POSIX.ipp:170 (chip-tool+0x98a147)
    #4 chip::DeviceLayer::PlatformManager::RunEventLoop() ../../src/include/platform/PlatformManager.h:362 (chip-tool+0x988f75)
    #5 chip::DeviceLayer::Internal::GenericPlatformManagerImpl_POSIX<chip::DeviceLayer::PlatformManagerImpl>::EventLoopTaskMain(void*) ../../src/include/platform/internal/GenericPlatformManagerImpl_POSIX.ipp:205 (chip-tool+0x98a87c)

  Thread T5 (tid=63013, running) created by main thread at:
    #0 pthread_create ../../../../src/libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:969 (libtsan.so.0+0x5ad75)
    #1 chip::DeviceLayer::Internal::GenericPlatformManagerImpl_POSIX<chip::DeviceLayer::PlatformManagerImpl>::_StartEventLoopTask() ../../src/include/platform/internal/GenericPlatformManagerImpl_POSIX.ipp:231 (chip-tool+0x98a40a)
    #2 chip::DeviceLayer::PlatformManager::StartEventLoopTask() ../../src/include/platform/PlatformManager.h:375 (chip-tool+0xaacca2)
    #3 chip::Controller::DeviceControllerFactory::ServiceEvents() ../../src/controller/CHIPDeviceControllerFactory.cpp:331 (chip-tool+0xab0417)
    #4 CHIPCommand::StartWaiting(std::chrono::duration<unsigned int, std::ratio<1l, 1000l> >) ../../examples/chip-tool/commands/common/CHIPCommand.cpp:403 (chip-tool+0x83e353)
    #5 CHIPCommand::Run() ../../examples/chip-tool/commands/common/CHIPCommand.cpp:187 (chip-tool+0x83c839)
    #6 Commands::RunCommand(int, char**, bool) ../../examples/chip-tool/commands/common/Commands.cpp:147 (chip-tool+0x85d4f7)
    #7 Commands::Run(int, char**) ../../examples/chip-tool/commands/common/Commands.cpp:51 (chip-tool+0x85c288)
    #8 main <null> (chip-tool+0x569c0a)

SUMMARY: ThreadSanitizer: data race ../../examples/chip-tool/commands/interactive/InteractiveCommands.cpp:127 in InteractiveStartCommand::ParseCommand(char*)
==================
bzbarsky-apple added a commit that referenced this pull request May 25, 2023
The failure looks like this:

  WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: race on NSMutableArray (pid=11619)
    Read-only access of NSMutableArray at 0x7b0c0005f5b0 by thread T3:
      #0 -[__NSArrayM countByEnumeratingWithState:objects:count:] <null>:2 (CoreFoundation:x86_64+0x4a338)
      #1 -[MTRDeviceControllerFactory(InternalMethods) operationalInstanceAdded:] MTRDeviceControllerFactory.mm:855 (Matter:x86_64+0x1fd2a)
      #2 MTROperationalBrowser::OnBrowse(_DNSServiceRef_t*, unsigned int, unsigned int, int, char const*, char const*, char const*, void*) MTROperationalBrowser.mm:100 (Matter:x86_64+0x20ee63c)
      #3 handle_browse_response <null>:2 (libsystem_dnssd.dylib:x86_64+0x3733)
      #4 _dispatch_client_callout <null>:2 (libdispatch.dylib:x86_64+0x3316)

    Previous modifying access of NSMutableArray at 0x7b0c0005f5b0 by main thread:
      #0 -[__NSArrayM addObject:] <null>:2 (CoreFoundation:x86_64+0x2457a)
      #1 -[MTRDeviceControllerFactory createController] MTRDeviceControllerFactory.mm:719 (Matter:x86_64+0x1cee3)
      #2 -[MTRDeviceControllerFactory createControllerOnExistingFabric:error:] MTRDeviceControllerFactory.mm:534 (Matter:x86_64+0x19792)

The basic problem is that we are in the middle of adding an object to
_controllers on the API consumer thread when on the Matter thread we get our
browse notification.

The changes here don't aim to lock around all access to _controllers, but just
to make sure that our mutations of it can't race with the access on the Matter
thread.  More coarse locking would need to be done very carefully, given the
amount of dispath_sync to the Matter thread we have going on.
bzbarsky-apple added a commit that referenced this pull request May 25, 2023
The failure looks like this:

  WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: race on NSMutableArray (pid=11619)
    Read-only access of NSMutableArray at 0x7b0c0005f5b0 by thread T3:
      #0 -[__NSArrayM countByEnumeratingWithState:objects:count:] <null>:2 (CoreFoundation:x86_64+0x4a338)
      #1 -[MTRDeviceControllerFactory(InternalMethods) operationalInstanceAdded:] MTRDeviceControllerFactory.mm:855 (Matter:x86_64+0x1fd2a)
      #2 MTROperationalBrowser::OnBrowse(_DNSServiceRef_t*, unsigned int, unsigned int, int, char const*, char const*, char const*, void*) MTROperationalBrowser.mm:100 (Matter:x86_64+0x20ee63c)
      #3 handle_browse_response <null>:2 (libsystem_dnssd.dylib:x86_64+0x3733)
      #4 _dispatch_client_callout <null>:2 (libdispatch.dylib:x86_64+0x3316)

    Previous modifying access of NSMutableArray at 0x7b0c0005f5b0 by main thread:
      #0 -[__NSArrayM addObject:] <null>:2 (CoreFoundation:x86_64+0x2457a)
      #1 -[MTRDeviceControllerFactory createController] MTRDeviceControllerFactory.mm:719 (Matter:x86_64+0x1cee3)
      #2 -[MTRDeviceControllerFactory createControllerOnExistingFabric:error:] MTRDeviceControllerFactory.mm:534 (Matter:x86_64+0x19792)

The basic problem is that we are in the middle of adding an object to
_controllers on the API consumer thread when on the Matter thread we get our
browse notification.

The changes here don't aim to lock around all access to _controllers, but just
to make sure that our mutations of it can't race with the access on the Matter
thread.  More coarse locking would need to be done very carefully, given the
amount of dispath_sync to the Matter thread we have going on.
bzbarsky-apple added a commit that referenced this pull request May 25, 2023
The failure looks like this:

  WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: race on NSMutableArray (pid=11619)
    Read-only access of NSMutableArray at 0x7b0c0005f5b0 by thread T3:
      #0 -[__NSArrayM countByEnumeratingWithState:objects:count:] <null>:2 (CoreFoundation:x86_64+0x4a338)
      #1 -[MTRDeviceControllerFactory(InternalMethods) operationalInstanceAdded:] MTRDeviceControllerFactory.mm:855 (Matter:x86_64+0x1fd2a)
      #2 MTROperationalBrowser::OnBrowse(_DNSServiceRef_t*, unsigned int, unsigned int, int, char const*, char const*, char const*, void*) MTROperationalBrowser.mm:100 (Matter:x86_64+0x20ee63c)
      #3 handle_browse_response <null>:2 (libsystem_dnssd.dylib:x86_64+0x3733)
      #4 _dispatch_client_callout <null>:2 (libdispatch.dylib:x86_64+0x3316)

    Previous modifying access of NSMutableArray at 0x7b0c0005f5b0 by main thread:
      #0 -[__NSArrayM addObject:] <null>:2 (CoreFoundation:x86_64+0x2457a)
      #1 -[MTRDeviceControllerFactory createController] MTRDeviceControllerFactory.mm:719 (Matter:x86_64+0x1cee3)
      #2 -[MTRDeviceControllerFactory createControllerOnExistingFabric:error:] MTRDeviceControllerFactory.mm:534 (Matter:x86_64+0x19792)

The basic problem is that we are in the middle of adding an object to
_controllers on the API consumer thread when on the Matter thread we get our
browse notification.

The changes here don't aim to lock around all access to _controllers, but just
to make sure that our mutations of it can't race with the access on the Matter
thread.  More coarse locking would need to be done very carefully, given the
amount of dispath_sync to the Matter thread we have going on.
bzbarsky-apple added a commit that referenced this pull request May 26, 2023
* Fix ThreadSanitizer failure in controller factory.

The failure looks like this:

  WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: race on NSMutableArray (pid=11619)
    Read-only access of NSMutableArray at 0x7b0c0005f5b0 by thread T3:
      #0 -[__NSArrayM countByEnumeratingWithState:objects:count:] <null>:2 (CoreFoundation:x86_64+0x4a338)
      #1 -[MTRDeviceControllerFactory(InternalMethods) operationalInstanceAdded:] MTRDeviceControllerFactory.mm:855 (Matter:x86_64+0x1fd2a)
      #2 MTROperationalBrowser::OnBrowse(_DNSServiceRef_t*, unsigned int, unsigned int, int, char const*, char const*, char const*, void*) MTROperationalBrowser.mm:100 (Matter:x86_64+0x20ee63c)
      #3 handle_browse_response <null>:2 (libsystem_dnssd.dylib:x86_64+0x3733)
      #4 _dispatch_client_callout <null>:2 (libdispatch.dylib:x86_64+0x3316)

    Previous modifying access of NSMutableArray at 0x7b0c0005f5b0 by main thread:
      #0 -[__NSArrayM addObject:] <null>:2 (CoreFoundation:x86_64+0x2457a)
      #1 -[MTRDeviceControllerFactory createController] MTRDeviceControllerFactory.mm:719 (Matter:x86_64+0x1cee3)
      #2 -[MTRDeviceControllerFactory createControllerOnExistingFabric:error:] MTRDeviceControllerFactory.mm:534 (Matter:x86_64+0x19792)

The basic problem is that we are in the middle of adding an object to
_controllers on the API consumer thread when on the Matter thread we get our
browse notification.

The changes here don't aim to lock around all access to _controllers, but just
to make sure that our mutations of it can't race with the access on the Matter
thread.  More coarse locking would need to be done very carefully, given the
amount of dispath_sync to the Matter thread we have going on.

* Address review comments.
bzbarsky-apple added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
…ist".

The typical failure there looks like this:

==29620==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

Direct leak of 88 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x106396e12 in calloc+0xa2 (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:x86_64+0x51e12)
    #1 0x7ff800dc9789 in map_images_nolock+0x24b (libobjc.A.dylib:x86_64h+0x1789)
    #2 0x7ff800dc94db in map_images+0x42 (libobjc.A.dylib:x86_64h+0x14db)
    #3 0x113d721fa in invocation function for block in dyld4::RuntimeState::setObjCNotifiers(void (*)(unsigned int, char const* const*, mach_header const* const*), void (*)(char const*, mach_header const*), void (*)(char const*, mach_header const*))+0x112 (dyld:x86_64+0xf1fa)
    #4 0x113d6d6c8 in dyld4::RuntimeState::withLoadersReadLock(void () block_pointer)+0x28 (dyld:x86_64+0xa6c8)
    #5 0x113d720e1 in dyld4::RuntimeState::setObjCNotifiers(void (*)(unsigned int, char const* const*, mach_header const* const*), void (*)(char const*, mach_header const*), void (*)(char const*, mach_header const*))+0x51 (dyld:x86_64+0xf0e1)
    #6 0x113d85d44 in dyld4::APIs::_dyld_objc_notify_register(void (*)(unsigned int, char const* const*, mach_header const* const*), void (*)(char const*, mach_header const*), void (*)(char const*, mach_header const*))+0x4e (dyld:x86_64+0x22d44)
    #7 0x7ff800dc9343 in _objc_init+0x4fe (libobjc.A.dylib:x86_64h+0x1343)
    #8 0x7ff800d83992 in _os_object_init+0xc (libdispatch.dylib:x86_64+0x2992)
    #9 0x7ff800d911b7 in libdispatch_init+0x136 (libdispatch.dylib:x86_64+0x101b7)
    #10 0x7ff80bd34894 in libSystem_initializer+0xed (libSystem.B.dylib:x86_64+0x1894)
    #11 0x113d77e4e in invocation function for block in dyld4::Loader::findAndRunAllInitializers(dyld4::RuntimeState&) const+0xb5 (dyld:x86_64+0x14e4e)
    #12 0x113d9eaac in invocation function for block in dyld3::MachOAnalyzer::forEachInitializer(Diagnostics&, dyld3::MachOAnalyzer::VMAddrConverter const&, void (unsigned int) block_pointer, void const*) const+0xf1 (dyld:x86_64+0x3baac)
    #13 0x113d95e25 in invocation function for block in dyld3::MachOFile::forEachSection(void (dyld3::MachOFile::SectionInfo const&, bool, bool&) block_pointer) const+0x22c (dyld:x86_64+0x32e25)
    #14 0x113d64db2 in dyld3::MachOFile::forEachLoadCommand(Diagnostics&, void (load_command const*, bool&) block_pointer) const+0x80 (dyld:x86_64+0x1db2)
    #15 0x113d95bb6 in dyld3::MachOFile::forEachSection(void (dyld3::MachOFile::SectionInfo const&, bool, bool&) block_pointer) const+0xb2 (dyld:x86_64+0x32bb6)
    #16 0x113d9e603 in dyld3::MachOAnalyzer::forEachInitializer(Diagnostics&, dyld3::MachOAnalyzer::VMAddrConverter const&, void (unsigned int) block_pointer, void const*) const+0x1d1 (dyld:x86_64+0x3b603)
    #17 0x113d77d81 in dyld4::Loader::findAndRunAllInitializers(dyld4::RuntimeState&) const+0x8f (dyld:x86_64+0x14d81)
    #18 0x113d7e659 in dyld4::PrebuiltLoader::runInitializers(dyld4::RuntimeState&) const+0x1d (dyld:x86_64+0x1b659)
    #19 0x113d8b76d in dyld4::APIs::runAllInitializersForMain()+0x25 (dyld:x86_64+0x2876d)
    #20 0x113d6938c in dyld4::prepare(dyld4::APIs&, dyld3::MachOAnalyzer const*)+0xd72 (dyld:x86_64+0x638c)
    #21 0x113d684e3 in start+0x183 (dyld:x86_64+0x54e3)
bzbarsky-apple added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
…ist".

The typical failure there looks like this:

==29620==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

Direct leak of 88 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x106396e12 in calloc+0xa2 (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:x86_64+0x51e12)
    #1 0x7ff800dc9789 in map_images_nolock+0x24b (libobjc.A.dylib:x86_64h+0x1789)
    #2 0x7ff800dc94db in map_images+0x42 (libobjc.A.dylib:x86_64h+0x14db)
    #3 0x113d721fa in invocation function for block in dyld4::RuntimeState::setObjCNotifiers(void (*)(unsigned int, char const* const*, mach_header const* const*), void (*)(char const*, mach_header const*), void (*)(char const*, mach_header const*))+0x112 (dyld:x86_64+0xf1fa)
    #4 0x113d6d6c8 in dyld4::RuntimeState::withLoadersReadLock(void () block_pointer)+0x28 (dyld:x86_64+0xa6c8)
    #5 0x113d720e1 in dyld4::RuntimeState::setObjCNotifiers(void (*)(unsigned int, char const* const*, mach_header const* const*), void (*)(char const*, mach_header const*), void (*)(char const*, mach_header const*))+0x51 (dyld:x86_64+0xf0e1)
    #6 0x113d85d44 in dyld4::APIs::_dyld_objc_notify_register(void (*)(unsigned int, char const* const*, mach_header const* const*), void (*)(char const*, mach_header const*), void (*)(char const*, mach_header const*))+0x4e (dyld:x86_64+0x22d44)
    #7 0x7ff800dc9343 in _objc_init+0x4fe (libobjc.A.dylib:x86_64h+0x1343)
    #8 0x7ff800d83992 in _os_object_init+0xc (libdispatch.dylib:x86_64+0x2992)
    #9 0x7ff800d911b7 in libdispatch_init+0x136 (libdispatch.dylib:x86_64+0x101b7)
    #10 0x7ff80bd34894 in libSystem_initializer+0xed (libSystem.B.dylib:x86_64+0x1894)
    #11 0x113d77e4e in invocation function for block in dyld4::Loader::findAndRunAllInitializers(dyld4::RuntimeState&) const+0xb5 (dyld:x86_64+0x14e4e)
    #12 0x113d9eaac in invocation function for block in dyld3::MachOAnalyzer::forEachInitializer(Diagnostics&, dyld3::MachOAnalyzer::VMAddrConverter const&, void (unsigned int) block_pointer, void const*) const+0xf1 (dyld:x86_64+0x3baac)
    #13 0x113d95e25 in invocation function for block in dyld3::MachOFile::forEachSection(void (dyld3::MachOFile::SectionInfo const&, bool, bool&) block_pointer) const+0x22c (dyld:x86_64+0x32e25)
    #14 0x113d64db2 in dyld3::MachOFile::forEachLoadCommand(Diagnostics&, void (load_command const*, bool&) block_pointer) const+0x80 (dyld:x86_64+0x1db2)
    #15 0x113d95bb6 in dyld3::MachOFile::forEachSection(void (dyld3::MachOFile::SectionInfo const&, bool, bool&) block_pointer) const+0xb2 (dyld:x86_64+0x32bb6)
    #16 0x113d9e603 in dyld3::MachOAnalyzer::forEachInitializer(Diagnostics&, dyld3::MachOAnalyzer::VMAddrConverter const&, void (unsigned int) block_pointer, void const*) const+0x1d1 (dyld:x86_64+0x3b603)
    #17 0x113d77d81 in dyld4::Loader::findAndRunAllInitializers(dyld4::RuntimeState&) const+0x8f (dyld:x86_64+0x14d81)
    #18 0x113d7e659 in dyld4::PrebuiltLoader::runInitializers(dyld4::RuntimeState&) const+0x1d (dyld:x86_64+0x1b659)
    #19 0x113d8b76d in dyld4::APIs::runAllInitializersForMain()+0x25 (dyld:x86_64+0x2876d)
    #20 0x113d6938c in dyld4::prepare(dyld4::APIs&, dyld3::MachOAnalyzer const*)+0xd72 (dyld:x86_64+0x638c)
    #21 0x113d684e3 in start+0x183 (dyld:x86_64+0x54e3)
bzbarsky-apple added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2023
…ist". (project-chip#29666)

The typical failure there looks like this:

==29620==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

Direct leak of 88 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x106396e12 in calloc+0xa2 (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:x86_64+0x51e12)
    #1 0x7ff800dc9789 in map_images_nolock+0x24b (libobjc.A.dylib:x86_64h+0x1789)
    #2 0x7ff800dc94db in map_images+0x42 (libobjc.A.dylib:x86_64h+0x14db)
    #3 0x113d721fa in invocation function for block in dyld4::RuntimeState::setObjCNotifiers(void (*)(unsigned int, char const* const*, mach_header const* const*), void (*)(char const*, mach_header const*), void (*)(char const*, mach_header const*))+0x112 (dyld:x86_64+0xf1fa)
    #4 0x113d6d6c8 in dyld4::RuntimeState::withLoadersReadLock(void () block_pointer)+0x28 (dyld:x86_64+0xa6c8)
    #5 0x113d720e1 in dyld4::RuntimeState::setObjCNotifiers(void (*)(unsigned int, char const* const*, mach_header const* const*), void (*)(char const*, mach_header const*), void (*)(char const*, mach_header const*))+0x51 (dyld:x86_64+0xf0e1)
    #6 0x113d85d44 in dyld4::APIs::_dyld_objc_notify_register(void (*)(unsigned int, char const* const*, mach_header const* const*), void (*)(char const*, mach_header const*), void (*)(char const*, mach_header const*))+0x4e (dyld:x86_64+0x22d44)
    #7 0x7ff800dc9343 in _objc_init+0x4fe (libobjc.A.dylib:x86_64h+0x1343)
    #8 0x7ff800d83992 in _os_object_init+0xc (libdispatch.dylib:x86_64+0x2992)
    #9 0x7ff800d911b7 in libdispatch_init+0x136 (libdispatch.dylib:x86_64+0x101b7)
    #10 0x7ff80bd34894 in libSystem_initializer+0xed (libSystem.B.dylib:x86_64+0x1894)
    #11 0x113d77e4e in invocation function for block in dyld4::Loader::findAndRunAllInitializers(dyld4::RuntimeState&) const+0xb5 (dyld:x86_64+0x14e4e)
    #12 0x113d9eaac in invocation function for block in dyld3::MachOAnalyzer::forEachInitializer(Diagnostics&, dyld3::MachOAnalyzer::VMAddrConverter const&, void (unsigned int) block_pointer, void const*) const+0xf1 (dyld:x86_64+0x3baac)
    #13 0x113d95e25 in invocation function for block in dyld3::MachOFile::forEachSection(void (dyld3::MachOFile::SectionInfo const&, bool, bool&) block_pointer) const+0x22c (dyld:x86_64+0x32e25)
    #14 0x113d64db2 in dyld3::MachOFile::forEachLoadCommand(Diagnostics&, void (load_command const*, bool&) block_pointer) const+0x80 (dyld:x86_64+0x1db2)
    #15 0x113d95bb6 in dyld3::MachOFile::forEachSection(void (dyld3::MachOFile::SectionInfo const&, bool, bool&) block_pointer) const+0xb2 (dyld:x86_64+0x32bb6)
    #16 0x113d9e603 in dyld3::MachOAnalyzer::forEachInitializer(Diagnostics&, dyld3::MachOAnalyzer::VMAddrConverter const&, void (unsigned int) block_pointer, void const*) const+0x1d1 (dyld:x86_64+0x3b603)
    #17 0x113d77d81 in dyld4::Loader::findAndRunAllInitializers(dyld4::RuntimeState&) const+0x8f (dyld:x86_64+0x14d81)
    #18 0x113d7e659 in dyld4::PrebuiltLoader::runInitializers(dyld4::RuntimeState&) const+0x1d (dyld:x86_64+0x1b659)
    #19 0x113d8b76d in dyld4::APIs::runAllInitializersForMain()+0x25 (dyld:x86_64+0x2876d)
    #20 0x113d6938c in dyld4::prepare(dyld4::APIs&, dyld3::MachOAnalyzer const*)+0xd72 (dyld:x86_64+0x638c)
    #21 0x113d684e3 in start+0x183 (dyld:x86_64+0x54e3)
bzbarsky-apple pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 29, 2024
* Rerouted tracing macros to Darwin signposts

* Initial framework for logging scalar data event

* Handled the new metrics event changes in collector

* Modified VerifyOrExit macro to accept an optional metric key as third argument

* Removed direct use of chrono in metrics_event.h
Switched MTRMetrics to vend dictionary for metric keys

* Modified SuccessOrExit to optionally accept metric key

* Moved metric keys to separate header
Reworked metric_event names for more clarity

* Switched MATTER_TRACE_METRIC usage to MATTER_LOG_METRIC

* Restyle fixes

* Fixed unit tests

* Fixed build failure due to MetricEvent hidden inside tracing enabled

* Fixing one source of build error

* Fixing darwin build failure

* Code Review: Rename LogMetric to LogMetricEvent

* Code Review Suggestions:

1. Metric Macros take full string constants and no longer use
   preprocessor to prefix. Allows free flowing strings
2. Reworked MetricEvent class and documented
3. Handled LogEventMetric for Darwin, ESP32, Perfetto, JSON to account
   for all types
4. Removed timePoint from MetricEvent class. Timestamps and duration
   calculation is now responsibility for the handlers of the event
5. Reverted BUILD.gn in system to not break out SystemClock.h

* Code Review Feedback #2:

1. Added SuccessOrExitWithMetric and VerifyOrExitWithMetric
2. Cleaned up support .gn to remove dependedency on metrics

* Code Review Feedback #3:

1. Added ScopedMetricEvent to use RAII to track begin and end within a
   scope

* Code Review #4:

Reverted an accidental removal

* Added MTRMetricData to description as per review comment

* Restyler fixes

* Sample code of how Begin and End log metrics can be used

* Fixed compilation error when tracing is disabled

* Fixes for build failures when tracing is disabled

* Picked up code review suggestion accidently dropped

* Code Review Feedback:

1. Begin metric does not take value
2. Allow undefined value for metric
3. Misc other feedback

* Handle undefined value and error value

* Revert a comment change

* Review Feedback: Changed ScopedMetricEvent to capture error by reference

* Fixed another build failure

* Reverting usage of LOG_METRICS

* Review feedback: Fix incorrect documentation

* Code Review Feedback: Remove access to Value in MetricEvent to avoid incorrect access

* Restyler fixes

* Unregistering backend in Darwin shutdown

* Resytler fixes...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
0 participants