Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Solution: use more dense implementation #21

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 11, 2015
Merged

Solution: use more dense implementation #21

merged 1 commit into from Nov 11, 2015

Conversation

c-rack
Copy link
Owner

@c-rack c-rack commented Nov 9, 2015

Solution: use more dense implementation.
Additionally, fix minor style issues.

Solution: use more concise implementation.
Additionally, fix minor style issues.
@c-rack c-rack changed the title Problem: some code parts are too verbose Solution: use more dense implementation Nov 9, 2015
c-rack added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2015
Solution: use more dense implementation
@c-rack c-rack merged commit 5a758dd into master Nov 11, 2015
@c-rack c-rack deleted the minify-code branch November 11, 2015 08:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant