Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix formatting for some lists #22

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 30, 2023

Conversation

CBonnell
Copy link
Member

@CBonnell CBonnell commented Jun 7, 2023

No description provided.

@CBonnell CBonnell merged commit a7a9e42 into cabforum:importTLSBRrefs Jun 30, 2023
1 check passed
@CBonnell CBonnell deleted the importTLSBRrefs branch June 30, 2023 10:49
CBonnell added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2023
* Import BRs up to chapter 2 and EVG 14.1

* Editorial note

* Import BRs up to section 7.1.4, without touching 7.1.4.

* Complete import of BR except for section 7.1.4.2.3

* Update definitions from BRs, acronyms from BRs and EVG, and references from BRs.

* BR Section 4.2.1 was not relevant for importing into the CSCBR. The actual valuable requirements seem to already be stated. It was decided to remove the reference.

* It was discussed that the numbering of section 4.9.1 is not aligned between CSBR and TLS BR. However, section CSBR 4.9.1.4 will be exactly the same as BR 4.9.1.2. As far as the import task is concerned, this is an acceptable solution. Renumbering section 4.9.1 should be addressed separately.

* Accepted by the WG

* Updated section 4.9.10 to add missing requirement with CSBRs version 2.8 that was not imported in version 3.0.0.

* Updated section 5.3 and imported EV section 14.1 requirements.

* Update after short meeting with Corey and Bruce at the F2F58

* Fix references to 3.2.2.1 and 3.2.2.2 for OV/EV validation sections.

* Addressed several EDITOR notes and suggested changes for OCSP retention.

* Adding effective date for the imported section from the TLS BRs.

* Removed editorial comments and language as agreed on the CSCWG Teleconference on 2023-04-06.

* Replace the proper title of "Network and Certificate System Security Requirements" instead of "Network Security Guidelines"

* Update copyright year

* Fix X.509 version reference to match the TLS BRs referenced version (08/2005).

* Removed editorial notes except the one in section 1.6.1 pending a final review.

* Remove "Enterprise RA" as an unused definition

* Remove "Expiry Date" as unused difinition

* Remove "Random Value" as unused definition

* Remove unused "Trustworthy System" definition

* Add High Risk Certificate Request definition

* Replace undefined "Requester" with "Certificate Requester"

This is almost more of a cleanup item, however I believe this fits in the definition of the BR Import ballot

* Add Certificate Policy Identifier

* Un-capitalize a few wordings

* Lowercase undefined words.

* Lowercase undefined words.

* Remove double "s"

* Import section 9.8 of the TLS BRs and combining with EV Code Signing Certificates.

* Small corrections

* Remove editor's note about definitions. Also pointing to definitions to the EV Guidelines and removing reference to the TLS BRs.

* missing space

* Change the order of "assigned" definition

Addresses #16 (comment)

* Improve language in 3.2.2

Addresses #16 (comment)

* Update version and ballot name

* Fix formatting for some lists (#22)

* Fix bulleted list formatting

* Fix formatting for numbered lists

* More format fixes

* capitalize SHALL

* Update version number

Co-authored-by: Corey Bonnell <corey.j.bonnell@outlook.com>

* Update effective date

Co-authored-by: Corey Bonnell <corey.j.bonnell@outlook.com>

* update effective date

Co-authored-by: Corey Bonnell <corey.j.bonnell@outlook.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Martijn Katerbarg <martijn.katerbarg@sectigo.com>
Co-authored-by: Corey Bonnell <corey.j.bonnell@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Corey Bonnell <corey.bonnell@digicert.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant