You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
There was a datasource with a number of issues most of which the tune sorted out. But it also showed, and still does, the following:
Required RRD step size is '60'
RRD maximum for Data Source 'traffic_in' should be 'NaN'
RRD maximum for Data Source 'traffic_out' should be 'NaN'
File RRA '0' has same CF/steps (AVERAGE, 1) as '1'
File RRA '1' has same CF/steps (AVERAGE, 1) as '0'
File RRA '9' has same CF/steps (MAX, 1) as '10'
File RRA '10' has same CF/steps (MAX, 1) as '9'
/usr/bin/rrdtool tune /usr/share/cacti/rra/501/10287.rrd --maximum traffic_in:NaN
/usr/bin/rrdtool tune /usr/share/cacti/rra/501/10287.rrd --maximum traffic_out:NaN
However, running the tune commands failed because RRDTool 1.6 does not support NaN as a valid value.
Expected behavior
The NaN should really be U
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Additionally, the Max values are being incorrectly calculated in some cases. One user reported an ifHighSpeed of 2000, and Cacti was recommending a maximum values of 1000.
Describe the bug
There was a datasource with a number of issues most of which the tune sorted out. But it also showed, and still does, the following:
However, running the tune commands failed because RRDTool 1.6 does not support NaN as a valid value.
Expected behavior
The NaN should really be U
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: