Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Attempt to support new lifecycle methods #22

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2018

Conversation

polytypic
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@polytypic polytypic force-pushed the using-new-react-lifecycle-methods branch from d81eb9e to 02eaed8 Compare April 16, 2018 17:45
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Apr 16, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #22 into master will increase coverage by 0.56%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #22      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.79%   94.36%   +0.56%     
==========================================
  Files           1        1              
  Lines         129      142      +13     
==========================================
+ Hits          121      134      +13     
  Misses          8        8
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
dist/karet.cjs.js 94.36% <0%> (+0.56%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 616ff6f...41b6018. Read the comment docs.

@polytypic polytypic force-pushed the using-new-react-lifecycle-methods branch 7 times, most recently from d6719f6 to a4dff96 Compare April 16, 2018 19:50
@polytypic polytypic force-pushed the using-new-react-lifecycle-methods branch from a4dff96 to 41b6018 Compare April 16, 2018 21:19
@polytypic polytypic merged commit 5b128cf into master Apr 16, 2018
@polytypic polytypic deleted the using-new-react-lifecycle-methods branch April 16, 2018 21:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants