[MRG] Add better checks to confirm proper installation of ghostscript #196
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thank you for raising the PR! I tried reproducing the steps you followed and they don't raise a similar error for me. See my comment on the original issue. I'm thinking of adding this to a new FAQ section along with some other common issues that are raised frequently. Let me look into creating a list! |
vinayak-mehta
changed the title
vinayak-mehta
changed the title
|
💚 💙 💜 💛 ❤️ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request addresses issue 193.
Just added a couple of extra paragraphs and examples that illustrate how not using the recommended OS installation steps can result in potentially only having the Ghostscript binary installed, and not the user libraries. The example showing the error only has the key error string: I did not want to include the full stack trace, so I created a URL link to the issue with the full Traceback encountered.
I was able to get sphinx installed per the instructions and built the new website on my laptop and confirmed that my additions display correctly. Only question I think would be about the content at this point.
Thanks,
JIM