Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rejection on start instance is not always responded to client #10250

Closed
korthout opened this issue Sep 1, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #10353
Closed

Rejection on start instance is not always responded to client #10250

korthout opened this issue Sep 1, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #10353
Assignees
Labels
area/ux Marks an issue as related to improving the user experience kind/bug Categorizes an issue or PR as a bug version:8.1.0 Marks an issue as being completely or in parts released in 8.1.0

Comments

@korthout
Copy link
Member

korthout commented Sep 1, 2022

Describe the bug

The rejection is only written on the log and not responded to in case a CreateProcessInstance with start instructions is rejected due to

See CreateProcessInstanceProcessor.java#L120-L123

Expected behavior

The rejection is also responded to the client.

@korthout korthout added kind/bug Categorizes an issue or PR as a bug area/ux Marks an issue as related to improving the user experience labels Sep 1, 2022
@korthout
Copy link
Member Author

korthout commented Sep 1, 2022

This should be picked up before the 8.1 release, as it belongs to the epic:

@korthout korthout self-assigned this Sep 14, 2022
@Zelldon Zelldon added the version:8.1.0 Marks an issue as being completely or in parts released in 8.1.0 label Oct 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/ux Marks an issue as related to improving the user experience kind/bug Categorizes an issue or PR as a bug version:8.1.0 Marks an issue as being completely or in parts released in 8.1.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants