Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport stable/8.3] docs: Remove the ExperimentalApi annotation from the Java client CommandWithTenantStep interface #16770

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 7, 2024

Conversation

backport-action
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Backport of #16753 to stable/8.3.

relates to #16548
original author: @mustafadagher

…andWithTenantStep interface

ExperimentalApi annotation removed from CommandWithTenantStep since multi-tenancy has been implemented for all RPCs

(cherry picked from commit b9b2e14)
Copy link
Contributor

@megglos megglos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job on handling the revapi check!

@megglos megglos added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 7, 2024
Added ignored-changes.json for revapi to ignore the removal of ExperimentalApi annotation from CommandWithTenantStep
@mustafadagher mustafadagher removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Mar 7, 2024
@mustafadagher mustafadagher added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 7, 2024
Merged via the queue into stable/8.3 with commit f97d520 Mar 7, 2024
31 checks passed
@mustafadagher mustafadagher deleted the backport-16753-to-stable/8.3 branch March 7, 2024 14:16
@lenaschoenburg lenaschoenburg added the version:8.3.10 Marks an issue as being completely or in parts released in 8.3.10 label Apr 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
version:8.3.10 Marks an issue as being completely or in parts released in 8.3.10
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants