Error:Invalid association handle trying to get build service to recognise registered snap

[Ads20000]

Summary

I’ve registered my snap using snapcraft register gifcurry-ads20000 but the build service doesn’t recognize that I have that name registered (that’s the name in my snapcraft.yaml) and then errors out when I try to log in via SSO.

Also reported on the forum.

Process

This is the process I went through:

• Fork https://github.com/snapcrafters/fork-and-rename-me using GitHub's Import repository feature
• Edit the snapcraft.yaml to an actual one that the build service accepts
• Change the name of the repo to appname
• Put the name in the snapcraft.yaml as appname-developername
• In Terminal, use snapcraft register appname-developername

Current and expected result

Current

I hit Sign In... and get taken to Ubuntu SSO. I log in there, then I get one of the following errors:

As you can see, my git-iplayer repo is registered as git-iplayer-ads20000 and the build service has no problem with that (except the build doesn't work because of a bug I've failed to fix, ignore that).

And here's the proof my snapcraft.yaml has the gifcurry-ads20000 name.

Expected

The build service should just see that I have the repository registered.

Screenshot

See above

[bartaz]

Hi @Ads20000, thank you for detailed bug report.

"Invalid association handle" error usually shows up when there is some problem with user session.

Could you sign out both from build.snapcraft.io and Ubuntu SSO (by going to https://login.ubuntu.com/ and clicking Log out)?
Or try to sign in and register name in browser Incognito/Private mode (to make sure you are using clean session)?

Let us know if problem persists.

[Ads20000]

Signing out from both sites and then signing in from the button on the build service worked, thank you, though I don't know how it got to that state in the first place. Also I still had to register the name via the GUI even though I had it registered with snapcraft register but I guess that wasn't so big an issue.

[joedborg]

I believe this is a duplicate of #623

[Ads20000]

I'm confused, #952 is a duplicate of #952?

[joedborg]

I'm confused, #952 is a duplicate of #952?

Sorry, my bad, i've updated the comment