Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing IPV6_AUTOCONF=no to render sysconfig dhcp6 stateful on RHEL #753

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Jan 7, 2021

Conversation

otubo
Copy link
Contributor

@otubo otubo commented Jan 6, 2021

Proposed Commit Message

IPV6_AUTOCONF needs to be set to 'no' on RHEL so NetworkManager can
properly acquire ipv6 address.

rhbz: #1859695

Signed-off-by: Eduardo Otubo otubo@redhat.com

Additional Context

According to additional tests from the reporter Tom Barron on the Original Bugzilla (1859695) the option IPV6_AUTOCONF should also be set to no on this specific case. Most of the BZ is marked as private, though.

Test Steps

(as described on the above mentioned BZ)
Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Create StorageNFS network with IPv6 CIDR and address range defined
  2. Create a Nova instance with 2 NICs, 2nd NIC connected to StorageNFS network
  3. Login to VM and examin Eth1 IP address

Actual results:
The Nova assigned IPv6 address was not assigned to device Eth1

Expected results:
Expected the Nova assigned IP address to be assigned to Eth1 interface

Checklist:

  • My code follows the process laid out in the documentation
  • I have updated or added any unit tests accordingly
  • I have updated or added any documentation accordingly

IPV6_AUTOCONF needs to be set to 'no' on RHEL so NetworkManager can
properly acquire ipv6 address.

rhbz: #1859695

Signed-off-by: Eduardo Otubo <otubo@redhat.com>
Copy link
Member

@TheRealFalcon TheRealFalcon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@OddBloke OddBloke merged commit ea6fcc1 into canonical:master Jan 7, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants