New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
"failed to obtain exit status for remote process" timeout when mounting #683
Comments
Hi @abulka, I created a new issue for you. I'm afraid it's not immediately clear what's going on. It's as if the instance starts fine, but locks up some time after and no commands reach it any more. Can you try launching an instance manually and see if it behaves fine? multipass launch --name test
multipass shell test If that works fine, try the snapcraft image: multipass launch --name test-snapcraft snapcraft:core18
multipass shell test-snapcraft Can you ping the instance IP, as shown by: multipass list FWIW you can restart snaps with Thanks, let us know how you fare. Come to |
@Saviq I tried those commands you suggested - all work ok. Am able to shell in and ping. Yet my snapcraft build fails with
Side Note: This is straight after doing a Further, the fact that snapcraft -s is broken see this issue which Evan has confirmed is a bug, for core18 based snaps, which ironically are the recommended snaps!, means a full But then I hit this multipass bug, which means I'm stuck for half a day till it magically clears up by itself (last time it did eventually). Update: I stopped all multipass VMs, did the |
@abulka sorry, you seem to have won the lottery for bugs between Multipass and snapcraft… Those IIUC you managed to get going in the end? |
@Saviq yes, I managed to get going in the end - thanks. The As for the lottery for bugs - yes its been a minefield! Add to that the fact that once I build a snap on Ubuntu 18.04 it won't even install via GUI on 16.04 due to this issue and has to be installed on 16.04 via command line instead. And even then, that doesn't work unless you also manually install |
@abulka re: restarting, that would suspend and resume the instances, so it might indeed not be enough. We'll be releasing a new version soon with a bunch of changes, hopefully it will improve your situation.
|
No firewall - just plain Ubuntu out of the box install. Mac host has
nothing special, no little snitch. No VPN anywhere.
Today I finally released my snap - after a week of struggles!
https://snapcraft.io/pynsource :-)
…On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 18:41, Michał Sawicz ***@***.***> wrote:
@abulka <https://github.com/abulka> re: restarting, that would suspend
and resume the instances, so it might indeed not be enough.
We'll be releasing a new version soon with a bunch of changes, hopefully
it will improve your situation.
Are you running any firewall (-like) software? A VPN? Little Snitch? They
may play tricks on the VMs' networking, too.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#683 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AK77CuI7dQd222Pr2PkjBgeJbv-rZjEUks5vYeY-gaJpZM4b5OnT>
.
|
Hi there, I had a similar problem, what solved it was to follow the steps in the Multipass subsection from the microk8s documentation:
|
This problem was caused for me by running a VPN on the host. Once I stopped the VPN on the host, this problem went away. |
I just got this "failed to obtain exit status for remote process" error out of the blue. I had been building snaps for a few days. Can no longer build snaps. I am on the latest Ubuntu 18.04. Tried rebooting Ubuntu - no help.
not sure why the versions are different to the multipass 2018.10.1 etc. numbering?
Anyway, the
snap disable multipass / snap enable multipass
trick above failed for me, becausemultipassd
seemed to get hosed and I wasn't sure how to restart it:So I
and things seemed to start working again. But then running snapcraft I got the same error I started with:
also getting
P.S. Installing multipass from --edge led to snapcraft just locking up. So I'm sticking with beta.
Any ideas?
Originally posted by @abulka in #552 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: