[DPE-3551] Fix large objects ownership #390
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Henrique Neppel <marcelo.neppel@canonical.com>
…s-ownership Signed-off-by: Marcelo Henrique Neppel <marcelo.neppel@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Henrique Neppel <marcelo.neppel@canonical.com>
dragomirp
approved these changes
Feb 19, 2024
taurus-forever
approved these changes
Feb 19, 2024
BON4
pushed a commit
to BON4/postgresql-k8s-operator
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2024
* Fix large objects ownership Signed-off-by: Marcelo Henrique Neppel <marcelo.neppel@canonical.com> * Bump LIBPATCH Signed-off-by: Marcelo Henrique Neppel <marcelo.neppel@canonical.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Marcelo Henrique Neppel <marcelo.neppel@canonical.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue
If we relate a charm like the MAAS operator to the PostgreSQL operator, remove the relation and relate again, then MAAS doesn't have access to the previously created PostgreSQL large objects.
#389
Solution
When a charm is related again to the PostgreSQL operator, give the ownership of the existing large objects to that charm user, as we already do for tables and other objects.