New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add temporary results to async.series() functions #52
Comments
I'm not sure, but I think waterfall do just what you want |
waterfall only passes the results to the next function. my proposal describes passing all results happend to every function. |
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its alizbazar@gmail.com ------- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------ ----==_mimepart_5335ae2a91294_7c9a3f992bedf2c081039 Closed #52. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: Closed #52. — ----==_mimepart_5335ae2a91294_7c9a3f992bedf2c081039-- |
By passing the actual result to each function in async series you would be able to use a fantastic code flow as followed:
With the actual async-code this is not possible, you have to use some variables in the scope where the async.series function will be called, the proposed backwards compatible change will allow much cleaner control flows
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: