Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optimize CodeQL analysis #541

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 30, 2020
Merged

Optimize CodeQL analysis #541

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 30, 2020

Conversation

jhutchings1
Copy link
Contributor

👋🏻 Hello, I'm a product manager at GitHub. I noticed that you're using CodeQL, but your workflow follows an older template of ours. This updated template reduces duplicate analyses by only running on push to master, or PRs to master.

Let me know if you have any questions

This reduces duplicate analyses by only running on push to master, or PRs to master.
@hifabienne hifabienne requested a review from fforootd July 30, 2020 06:07
@fforootd
Copy link
Member

Thanks for updating the workflow, file. This looks fine and will definitely reduce the number of scans.

@fforootd fforootd added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 30, 2020
@fforootd fforootd merged commit 8cdd3a3 into zitadel:master Jul 30, 2020
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.65.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants