-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 214
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Total and available balance are reported as 0 until transaction gets into ledger #286
Closed
3 tasks done
Milestone
Comments
iohk-bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 21, 2019
283: Sqlite: add checkpoints and transactions to DBLayer r=KtorZ a=rvl Relates to issue #154. # Overview - Implemented saving and loading of transaction history to SQLite - Implemented saving and loading of wallet checkpoints to SQLite, including the state for sequential scheme address discovery. # Comments - The SqliteSpec testing is a bit light. However, there should be enough implemented for all the DBSpec tests to work. Also I plan to finish the QSM tests tomorrow which should provide even more coverage. - Cascading deletes are not working with persistent-sqlite, which is annoying. - DB indexes are missing on some fields. (Needs some custom SQL, can be fixed later) 289: show feature availability in API specification r=KtorZ a=KtorZ # Issue Number <!-- Put here a reference to the issue this PR relates to and which requirements it tackles --> N/A # Overview <!-- Detail in a few bullet points the work accomplished in this PR --> - [ ] I have removed the"priority" from the specification and added a "status" indicating the availability of a particular feature in the API. # Comments <!-- Additional comments or screenshots to attach if any --> As requested by Chris. Makes it easier for externals to know what's available or not. A preview: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5680256/58074137-bdc26f00-7ba4-11e9-95b5-33ff723e0f2a.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5680256/58074150-c6b34080-7ba4-11e9-83a5-943877e14fd7.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5680256/58074161-cfa41200-7ba4-11e9-8d83-0948b129e856.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5680256/58074177-dd599780-7ba4-11e9-867e-5047012b1f93.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5680256/58074188-e5193c00-7ba4-11e9-845c-cacfd34a9fc9.png) <!-- Don't forget to: ✓ Self-review your changes to make sure nothing unexpected slipped through ✓ Assign yourself to the PR ✓ Assign one or several reviewer(s) ✓ Once created, link this PR to its corresponding ticket ✓ Acknowledge any changes required to the Wiki --> 292: Fix Change Calculation (#286) r=KtorZ a=KtorZ # Issue Number <!-- Put here a reference to the issue this PR relates to and which requirements it tackles --> #286 # Overview <!-- Detail in a few bullet points the work accomplished in this PR --> - [x] I have extended our test to capture the issue highlighted in the bug - [x] I have looked at the test failing - [x] I have fixed the calculation of the change which was... weirdly way off the specification.. # Comments <!-- Additional comments or screenshots to attach if any --> <!-- Don't forget to: ✓ Self-review your changes to make sure nothing unexpected slipped through ✓ Assign yourself to the PR ✓ Assign one or several reviewer(s) ✓ Once created, link this PR to its corresponding ticket ✓ Acknowledge any changes required to the Wiki --> Co-authored-by: Rodney Lorrimar <rodney.lorrimar@iohk.io> Co-authored-by: Pawel Jakubas <pawel.jakubas@iohk.io> Co-authored-by: KtorZ <matthias.benkort@gmail.com>
iohk-bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 21, 2019
283: Sqlite: add checkpoints and transactions to DBLayer r=KtorZ a=rvl Relates to issue #154. # Overview - Implemented saving and loading of transaction history to SQLite - Implemented saving and loading of wallet checkpoints to SQLite, including the state for sequential scheme address discovery. # Comments - The SqliteSpec testing is a bit light. However, there should be enough implemented for all the DBSpec tests to work. Also I plan to finish the QSM tests tomorrow which should provide even more coverage. - Cascading deletes are not working with persistent-sqlite, which is annoying. - DB indexes are missing on some fields. (Needs some custom SQL, can be fixed later) 289: show feature availability in API specification r=KtorZ a=KtorZ # Issue Number <!-- Put here a reference to the issue this PR relates to and which requirements it tackles --> N/A # Overview <!-- Detail in a few bullet points the work accomplished in this PR --> - [ ] I have removed the"priority" from the specification and added a "status" indicating the availability of a particular feature in the API. # Comments <!-- Additional comments or screenshots to attach if any --> As requested by Chris. Makes it easier for externals to know what's available or not. A preview: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5680256/58074137-bdc26f00-7ba4-11e9-95b5-33ff723e0f2a.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5680256/58074150-c6b34080-7ba4-11e9-83a5-943877e14fd7.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5680256/58074161-cfa41200-7ba4-11e9-8d83-0948b129e856.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5680256/58074177-dd599780-7ba4-11e9-867e-5047012b1f93.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5680256/58074188-e5193c00-7ba4-11e9-845c-cacfd34a9fc9.png) <!-- Don't forget to: ✓ Self-review your changes to make sure nothing unexpected slipped through ✓ Assign yourself to the PR ✓ Assign one or several reviewer(s) ✓ Once created, link this PR to its corresponding ticket ✓ Acknowledge any changes required to the Wiki --> 292: Fix Change Calculation (#286) r=KtorZ a=KtorZ # Issue Number <!-- Put here a reference to the issue this PR relates to and which requirements it tackles --> #286 # Overview <!-- Detail in a few bullet points the work accomplished in this PR --> - [x] I have extended our test to capture the issue highlighted in the bug - [x] I have looked at the test failing - [x] I have fixed the calculation of the change which was... weirdly way off the specification.. # Comments <!-- Additional comments or screenshots to attach if any --> <!-- Don't forget to: ✓ Self-review your changes to make sure nothing unexpected slipped through ✓ Assign yourself to the PR ✓ Assign one or several reviewer(s) ✓ Once created, link this PR to its corresponding ticket ✓ Acknowledge any changes required to the Wiki --> 296: Improve bech32 coveralls r=KtorZ a=piotr-iohk # Issue Number <!-- Put here a reference to the issue this PR relates to and which requirements it tackles --> # Overview <!-- Detail in a few bullet points the work accomplished in this PR --> - [ ] I have replaced `isLeft` with `Left ...` here and there to improve coveralls score a bit # Comments <!-- Additional comments or screenshots to attach if any --> <!-- Don't forget to: ✓ Self-review your changes to make sure nothing unexpected slipped through ✓ Assign yourself to the PR ✓ Assign one or several reviewer(s) ✓ Once created, link this PR to its corresponding ticket ✓ Acknowledge any changes required to the Wiki --> Co-authored-by: Rodney Lorrimar <rodney.lorrimar@iohk.io> Co-authored-by: Pawel Jakubas <pawel.jakubas@iohk.io> Co-authored-by: KtorZ <matthias.benkort@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Piotr Stachyra <piotr.stachyra@iohk.io>
iohk-bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 21, 2019
292: Fix Change Calculation (#286) r=KtorZ a=KtorZ # Issue Number <!-- Put here a reference to the issue this PR relates to and which requirements it tackles --> #286 # Overview <!-- Detail in a few bullet points the work accomplished in this PR --> - [x] I have extended our test to capture the issue highlighted in the bug - [x] I have looked at the test failing - [x] I have fixed the calculation of the change which was... weirdly way off the specification.. # Comments <!-- Additional comments or screenshots to attach if any --> <!-- Don't forget to: ✓ Self-review your changes to make sure nothing unexpected slipped through ✓ Assign yourself to the PR ✓ Assign one or several reviewer(s) ✓ Once created, link this PR to its corresponding ticket ✓ Acknowledge any changes required to the Wiki --> Co-authored-by: KtorZ <matthias.benkort@gmail.com>
KtorZ
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 21, 2019
…culation Fix Change Calculation (#286)
👍 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Context
Steps to Reproduce
cardano-wallet transaction create 617963656a40...22af90400 --payment 22@2cWKMJemoBahXP5nbxG1...XuDjkLJUNQGCbw36NVGmuj
or
Verify with:
curl -vX GET http://localhost:8090/v2/wallets | jq
Expected behavior
Total balance should NOT be reported as
0
after posting a transaction.Available balance might be dropping to
0
(Since there may be one UTxO, which is used during the transaction)Actual behavior
After posting the transaction (via API or CLI) the source wallet reports balance = 0 (total and available) until the transaction gets in the ledger (namely until this is reported on
cardano-wallet server
log:[DEBUG] : - +0.000010 in ledger since 47.5487
). After that the balance seems to be reported correctly, but for couple of seconds (~ 10-45 sec) the balance is 0, which can be somewhat misleading...Resolution Plan
PR
master
QA
I've added a few assertions in
Scenario/Transactions
to capture the bug described above (and I could see the test fail as expected): https://github.com/input-output-hk/cardano-wallet/blob/master/lib/http-bridge/test/integration/Test/Integration/Scenario/Transactions.hs#L73-L97Then, reviewed the implementation for the change UTxO calculation which contained some unnecessary set restrictions which may have come from a wrong merge-conflict resolutions, or simply inattention. This is now fix and implemented according to the wallet specification.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: