Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs, polish and config param 16 #275

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2019
Merged

Docs, polish and config param 16 #275

merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2019

Conversation

Anviking
Copy link
Collaborator

Issue Number

#218

Overview

  • Appropriated some doc comments from the list of config params
  • Added missing KesUpdateSpeed parameter
  • Added ConsensusVersion data-type
  • Some other super-minor polish

Comments

⚠️ the base is temporarily not master ⚠️

@Anviking Anviking self-assigned this May 16, 2019
@KtorZ KtorZ mentioned this pull request May 16, 2019
5 tasks
@KtorZ KtorZ changed the base branch from anviking/218/jörmungandr-tx to master May 17, 2019 07:04
@KtorZ KtorZ self-requested a review May 17, 2019 07:04
@@ -282,11 +301,20 @@ newtype LeaderId = LeaderId ByteString
data LinearFee = LinearFee Word64 Word64 Word64
deriving (Eq, Show)

data ConsensusVersion = BFT | GenesisPraos
deriving (Eq, Show)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@KtorZ
Copy link
Member

KtorZ commented May 17, 2019

bors r+

iohk-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2019
274: Implement ability to list addresses in the wallet layer, API and CLI r=KtorZ a=KtorZ

# Issue Number

<!-- Put here a reference to the issue this PR relates to and which requirements it tackles -->

#220 

# Overview

<!-- Detail in a few bullet points the work accomplished in this PR -->

- [ ] I have implemented the ability to list addresses in the wallet layer, API and CLI

# Comments

<!-- Additional comments or screenshots to attach if any -->

This would make it easier for @piotr-iohk and us to write some integration tests for the transaction API. We could have derived addresses by hand, but this achieves to complete the high-priority endpoints of the API.

NOTE: It's a "partial" implementation which for now, ignores the filtering based on the address state (`?state=used` or `?state=unused`). This can be implemented later.

:warning: I recommend looking at the change commit by commit ;) 

<!-- 
Don't forget to:

 ✓ Self-review your changes to make sure nothing unexpected slipped through
 ✓ Assign yourself to the PR
 ✓ Assign one or several reviewer(s)
 ✓ Once created, link this PR to its corresponding ticket
 ✓ Acknowledge any changes required to the Wiki
-->


275: Docs, polish and config param 16 r=KtorZ a=Anviking

# Issue Number

#218 


# Overview

- [x] Appropriated some doc comments from the [list of config params](https://github.com/input-output-hk/rust-cardano/blob/master/chain-impl-mockchain/doc/format.md)
- [x] Added missing `KesUpdateSpeed ` parameter
- [x] Added `ConsensusVersion` data-type
- [x] Some other super-minor polish


# Comments

<!-- Additional comments or screenshots to attach if any -->

⚠️  the base is temporarily not `master` ⚠️ 

<!-- 
Don't forget to:

 ✓ Self-review your changes to make sure nothing unexpected slipped through
 ✓ Assign yourself to the PR
 ✓ Assign one or several reviewer(s)
 ✓ Once created, link this PR to its corresponding ticket
 ✓ Acknowledge any changes required to the Wiki
-->

Co-authored-by: KtorZ <matthias.benkort@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Johannes Lund <johannes.lund@iohk.io>
@iohk-bors
Copy link
Contributor

iohk-bors bot commented May 17, 2019

Timed out (retrying...)

iohk-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2019
275: Docs, polish and config param 16 r=KtorZ a=Anviking

# Issue Number

#218 


# Overview

- [x] Appropriated some doc comments from the [list of config params](https://github.com/input-output-hk/rust-cardano/blob/master/chain-impl-mockchain/doc/format.md)
- [x] Added missing `KesUpdateSpeed ` parameter
- [x] Added `ConsensusVersion` data-type
- [x] Some other super-minor polish


# Comments

<!-- Additional comments or screenshots to attach if any -->

⚠️  the base is temporarily not `master` ⚠️ 

<!-- 
Don't forget to:

 ✓ Self-review your changes to make sure nothing unexpected slipped through
 ✓ Assign yourself to the PR
 ✓ Assign one or several reviewer(s)
 ✓ Once created, link this PR to its corresponding ticket
 ✓ Acknowledge any changes required to the Wiki
-->

Co-authored-by: Johannes Lund <johannes.lund@iohk.io>
@iohk-bors
Copy link
Contributor

iohk-bors bot commented May 17, 2019

Timed out

@Anviking Anviking force-pushed the anviking/218/polish branch 2 times, most recently from 510ba8e to a736a27 Compare May 17, 2019 12:31
- use Data.Quantity for LinearFee and config params
- Polish comments and error message
@Anviking
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bors r+

iohk-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2019
275: Docs, polish and config param 16 r=Anviking a=Anviking

# Issue Number

#218 


# Overview

- [x] Appropriated some doc comments from the [list of config params](https://github.com/input-output-hk/rust-cardano/blob/master/chain-impl-mockchain/doc/format.md)
- [x] Added missing `KesUpdateSpeed ` parameter
- [x] Added `ConsensusVersion` data-type
- [x] Some other super-minor polish


# Comments

<!-- Additional comments or screenshots to attach if any -->

⚠️  the base is temporarily not `master` ⚠️ 

<!-- 
Don't forget to:

 ✓ Self-review your changes to make sure nothing unexpected slipped through
 ✓ Assign yourself to the PR
 ✓ Assign one or several reviewer(s)
 ✓ Once created, link this PR to its corresponding ticket
 ✓ Acknowledge any changes required to the Wiki
-->

Co-authored-by: Johannes Lund <johannes.lund@iohk.io>
@iohk-bors
Copy link
Contributor

iohk-bors bot commented May 17, 2019

Timed out

@KtorZ KtorZ merged commit f222b46 into master May 17, 2019
@iohk-bors iohk-bors bot deleted the anviking/218/polish branch May 17, 2019 14:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants