Small fixes from Carpentries Lab review

[svenvanderburg]

Fixes:

• Do not use " in objectives and questions
• Do not use " in keypoints
• Fix alt text huber loss image

[github-actions]

Thank you!

Thank you for your pull request 😃

🤖 This automated message can help you check the rendered files in your submission for clarity. If you have any questions, please feel free to open an issue in {sandpaper}.

If you have files that automatically render output (e.g. R Markdown), then you should check for the following:

• 🎯 correct output
• 🖼️ correct figures
• ❓ new warnings
• ‼️ new errors

Rendered Changes

🔍 Inspect the changes: https://github.com/carpentries-incubator/deep-learning-intro/compare/md-outputs..md-outputs-PR-444

The following changes were observed in the rendered markdown documents:

 1-introduction.md         | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 2-keras.md                | 26 ++++++++++++------------
 3-monitor-the-model.md    | 30 ++++++++++++++--------------
 4-advanced-layer-types.md | 20 +++++++++----------
 5-outlook.md              | 18 ++++++++---------
 md5sum.txt                | 38 +++++++++++++++++------------------
 6 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)

What does this mean?

If you have source files that require output and figures to be generated (e.g. R Markdown), then it is important to make sure the generated figures and output are reproducible.

This output provides a way for you to inspect the output in a diff-friendly manner so that it's easy to see the changes that occur due to new software versions or randomisation.

⏱️ Updated at 2024-02-18 13:11:42 +0000

[carschno]

Some markup issues remain (missing alt-text, http instead of https links), but they are not related to these changes.

[dsmits]

Looks good to me