Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add +1 to Instructor Training auto-score for Chemistry #1505

Closed
karenword opened this issue May 6, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1528
Closed

Add +1 to Instructor Training auto-score for Chemistry #1505

karenword opened this issue May 6, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1528
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@karenword
Copy link

If "areas of expertise" includes "Chemistry" Instructor Training applicants should now receive a +1 on their application auto-score.

@maneesha
Copy link
Contributor

maneesha commented Jun 24, 2019

@karenword Is this still relevant? If so, do you see this as a one time change, or will we change how autoscoring works on a regular basis, depending on the communities we want to engage?

Which of the following applies to when you want to see this fixed?

  1. Would like to see this fixed as soon as possible, in the next 1-2 development cycles (i.e., by September 2019) I would think it would be this option if it's a one time change
  2. Would like to see this fixed later (by the end of 2019)
  3. Would like to see this fixed, but possibly as part of a larger project that needs more planning I would think it would be this option if we see the need to make changes to autoscoring regularly
  4. Not sure
  5. No longer relevant - OK to close

An answer of "1 for now and 3 long term" is also perfectly acceptable!

@karenword
Copy link
Author

I believe this is still relevant and will continue to see changes regularly (hence option 3) but tagging @ErinBecker because I submitted this PR at her request.

@ErinBecker
Copy link
Contributor

  1. We have a grant obligation to build a community in Chemistry. There may be changes to this scoring in the future, but at the scale of 6mo-1yr, so I'd rather make this as a "one time" change and not worry about a general solution right now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants