You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@karenword Is this still relevant? If so, do you see this as a one time change, or will we change how autoscoring works on a regular basis, depending on the communities we want to engage?
Which of the following applies to when you want to see this fixed?
Would like to see this fixed as soon as possible, in the next 1-2 development cycles (i.e., by September 2019) I would think it would be this option if it's a one time change
Would like to see this fixed later (by the end of 2019)
Would like to see this fixed, but possibly as part of a larger project that needs more planning I would think it would be this option if we see the need to make changes to autoscoring regularly
Not sure
No longer relevant - OK to close
An answer of "1 for now and 3 long term" is also perfectly acceptable!
I believe this is still relevant and will continue to see changes regularly (hence option 3) but tagging @ErinBecker because I submitted this PR at her request.
We have a grant obligation to build a community in Chemistry. There may be changes to this scoring in the future, but at the scale of 6mo-1yr, so I'd rather make this as a "one time" change and not worry about a general solution right now.
If "areas of expertise" includes "Chemistry" Instructor Training applicants should now receive a +1 on their application auto-score.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: