Initial draft of the 'Stay on target' lesson

[anenadic]

Ready for review!

• is there too much content on MCQs?
• do we need more on guided practice (e.g. an extra sentence to explain things a bit more)

[github-actions]

Thank you!

Thank you for your pull request 😃

🤖 This automated message can help you check the rendered files in your submission for clarity. If you have any questions, please feel free to open an issue in {sandpaper}.

If you have files that automatically render output (e.g. R Markdown), then you should check for the following:

• 🎯 correct output
• 🖼️ correct figures
• ❓ new warnings
• ‼️ new errors

Rendered Changes

🔍 Inspect the changes: https://github.com/carpentries/lesson-development-training/compare/md-outputs..md-outputs-PR-59

The following changes were observed in the rendered markdown documents:

 09-formative-assessment.md | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 md5sum.txt                 |   2 +-
 2 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

What does this mean?

If you have source files that require output and figures to be generated (e.g. R Markdown), then it is important to make sure the generated figures and output are reproducible.

This output provides a way for you to inspect the output in a diff-friendly manner so that it's easy to see the changes that occur due to new software versions or randomisation.

⏱️ Updated at 2022-06-08 10:57:18 +0000

[sstevens2]

Nice draft @anenadic! Left a few inline comments. Sorry I accidentally submitted a couple as individual suggestions. Not a changed line but maybe line 131 might be better as an instructor note.

I'm still feeling like hidden curriculum doesn't flow well in the lesson. Maybe a callout?

[tobyhodges]

I am +1 to all of @sstevens2's suggestions, and have made a few small comments of my own as well. Otherwise, this looks good @anenadic - thanks!

[anenadic]

Nice draft @anenadic! Left a few inline comments. Sorry I accidentally submitted a couple as individual suggestions.

Totally fine, go for it!

Not a changed line but maybe line 131 might be better as an instructor note.

Which one is line 131 now @sstevens2 so I can address it?

I'm still feeling like hidden curriculum doesn't flow well in the lesson. Maybe a callout?

I was struggling with hidden curriculum myself - I agree that it could go into a callout. I have fixed this via 131b02f - see if this works better @sstevens2. Also a nudge to @tobyhodges to check this change.

[sstevens2]

Yeah, the hidden curriculum part was probably too much information. I liked it because I think it encourages trainees to consider how the written lesson content and the way it is taught combine together to create an impression on the learner. Using an Instructor Note here feels like a good compromise.

It is an interesting concept for lesson developers to consider. Maybe we can find a place to spend more time on it in the future?

[sstevens2]

@anenadic

Which one is line 131 now @sstevens2 so I can address it?

Line 131 right now: "(this exercise will only work if participants have sufficient knowledge of their partner's topic)"

[tobyhodges]

Great stuff @anenadic 🙌