-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 421
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Skip dependencies #1314
Comments
This seems useful, and also very easy to implement. As far as the name of the flag goes, |
Thank you for the reply @casey. If I were to create a PR for this, you would be willing to consider it, then? |
Oh yeah, definitely. Check out the tests in
|
Feel free to ping me if you have any issues! |
Thank you @casey. Since I didn't get to start on this immediately, I thought I'd give an update. I might be a bit slow, as I don't have a lot of free time, but I'll definitely get around to this! 😄 |
@a1russell No worries at all! |
using this flag one can just re-run only that task specified in the cmd line. Closes: casey#1314
using this flag one can just re-run only that task specified in the cmd line. Closes: casey#1314
I believe this can be closed now that #1819 was merged. 😄 |
Yep, I feel bad I never got around to this. Life got in the way. Thanks @ngharrington! |
Oftentimes when I'm writing a new recipe, I'd like to re-run that task, and only that task. I don't want the dependencies to run because they might take a long time, and I know they're up-to-date.
Another way to say this is: I'd like a way to run the recipes specified explicitly given on the command line, without any dependencies. One example I can find of this feature is Fake's
--single-target
parameter.I'm aware of several workarounds for this, but it would be very nice to have this feature baked in. To list a few of the workarounds, so that I might illustrate why I would like this feature:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: