Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mention Make’s “phony target” workaround in the comparison #421

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 1, 2019

Conversation

roryokane
Copy link
Contributor

I think mentioning .PHONY is necessary to be fair to Make. Someone might decide that using phony targets in Make is the best solution for them (e.g. due to portability), despite Make having worse error messages and so on, and we shouldn’t hide this option from them. But I tried to mention the reasons one might prefer Just’s implementation of phony targets.

roryokane and others added 3 commits April 26, 2019 12:46
I think mentioning `.PHONY` is necessary to be fair to Make. Someone might decide that using phony targets in Make is the best solution for them (e.g. due to portability), despite Make having worse error messages and so on, and we shouldn’t hide this option from them. But I tried to mention the reasons one might prefer Just’s implementation of phony targets.
@casey casey merged commit a740200 into casey:master May 1, 2019
@casey
Copy link
Owner

casey commented May 1, 2019

I think that's totally reasonable. Thank you for the PR!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants