Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: Do not cache locally published artifacts #316

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 16, 2024

Conversation

marcospereira
Copy link
Contributor

What?

These workflows publish artifacts to the local maven repository, which are then cached by GH Actions. Removing them at the end of the workflow prevents them from polluting the cache.

Related to #310 (comment).

It would still be good to delete the existing caches before merging this, and check the effect it would have on #310. Deleting the caches is straightforward if you have GH CLI installed:

gh cache delete --all

These workflows publish artifacts to local maven repository, which are
then cached by GH Actions. Removing them at the end of the workflow
prevents them to pollute the cache.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (7ad2e12) 91.20% compared to head (cd410f2) 91.20%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main     #316   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     91.20%   91.20%           
  Complexity     1211     1211           
=========================================
  Files            76       76           
  Lines          3151     3151           
  Branches        492      492           
=========================================
  Hits           2874     2874           
  Misses          164      164           
  Partials        113      113           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@casid
Copy link
Owner

casid commented Jan 12, 2024

@marcospereira it seems the windows build is still failing?

@marcospereira
Copy link
Contributor Author

@marcospereira it seems the windows build is still failing?

This is good to go now. :-)

@casid casid merged commit de6880b into casid:main Jan 16, 2024
8 checks passed
@casid
Copy link
Owner

casid commented Jan 16, 2024

Thank you @marcospereira!

@marcospereira marcospereira deleted the ci/fix-caching-issues branch January 16, 2024 16:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants