update valid license values #6357
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* change :free (closed-source) to :gratis for clarity * add :freemium (eg Alfred) * add :lppl (LaTeX) * change :ubuntu to :ubuntu_font
rolandwalker
force-pushed
the
tweak_license_types
branch
from
842496c
to
f36d8e5
Compare
rolandwalker
changed the title
rolandwalker
changed the title
rolandwalker
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2014
update valid license values
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
:free(closed source) to:gratisfor clarity:freemium(eg Alfred):lppl(LaTeX):ubuntuto:ubuntu_fontWIP pending discussion here and/or in IRC. In particular, I thinkAfter some discussion on IRC, these changes seem OK — good enough to move forward.:freeis a poor name, and would lead to confusion.There will always be rough points.
licenseis intended for search/filtering, not annotation. The most accurate information is always the distribution's home page.In IRC, we also discussed whether all licenses under
:closedshould be eliminated in favor of just:closed. For the record, I am open to that, if licensing distinctions inspire a too much argument and absorb non-trivial maintainer time.