Rename EIA denorm assets

[bendnorman]

PR Overview

This PR applies the naming conventions from #2517 to the denormalized EIA assets. It does not resolve the duplicate EIA aggregation issue #2857.

PR Checklist

• Merge the most recent version of the branch you are merging into (probably dev).
• All CI checks are passing. Run tests locally to debug failures
• Make sure you've included good docstrings.
• For major data coverage & analysis changes, run data validation tests
• Include unit tests for new functions and classes.
• Defensive data quality/sanity checks in analyses & data processing functions.
• Update the release notes and reference reference the PR and related issues.
• Do your own explanatory review of the PR to help the reviewer understand what's going on and identify issues preemptively.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.0% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (0a912e4) 88.5% compared to head (a2042de) 88.5%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##           rename-core-assets   #2858   +/-   ##
==================================================
  Coverage                88.5%   88.5%           
==================================================
  Files                      90      90           
  Lines                   10139   10139           
==================================================
  Hits                     8982    8982           
  Misses                   1157    1157           

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
src/pudl/analysis/allocate_gen_fuel.py	91.3% <ø> (ø)
src/pudl/analysis/mcoe.py	97.4% <ø> (ø)
src/pudl/analysis/service_territory.py	52.1% <ø> (ø)
src/pudl/metadata/resources/eia.py	100.0% <ø> (ø)
src/pudl/metadata/resources/eia860.py	100.0% <ø> (ø)
src/pudl/metadata/resources/eia923.py	100.0% <ø> (ø)
src/pudl/output/ferc714.py	96.2% <ø> (ø)
src/pudl/output/eia.py	59.0% <100.0%> (ø)
src/pudl/output/eia860.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
src/pudl/output/eia923.py	97.7% <100.0%> (ø)
... and 1 more

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[e-belfer]

Non-blocking: One strategy to avoid resolving migration conflicts when we start to merge these all into the core branch is to actually rebase this on your FERC PR and have the migrations build on one another.

Non-blocking: The python-output-table-conversion-debug looks like it's missing updated names. If we want to do a separate notebook cleanup PR at the end of our various renames that makes sense to me, though.

Otherwise I was able to run the fast ETL and build the docs successfully.