Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge in content-format tags #7

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 10, 2021
Merged

Merge in content-format tags #7

merged 1 commit into from Jul 10, 2021

Conversation

cabo
Copy link
Contributor

@cabo cabo commented Jul 4, 2021

Get rid of the separate draft "draft-bormann-cbor-tag-coap-content-format", which turns into Section 5.2 and Appendix A.

@cabo cabo requested a review from mcr July 4, 2021 20:28
@@ -168,8 +174,10 @@ The most obvious is that it may allow malware to identify interesting objects on

# IANA Considerations

There are no IANA actions.
This section documents the allocation that was done.
{{cbor-sequence-tag}} documents the allocation that was done for a
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems weird to have a forward reference in what is normally a closing section of an RFC.
Should we change the order of sections?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not a "forward reference". Sections often start with saying what is in the section. Here, we have links to the two subsections. I don't know what exactly irks you here.

@mcr mcr merged commit 80af6d2 into main Jul 10, 2021
@mcr mcr deleted the content-format-tags branch July 10, 2021 16:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants