-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 111
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Putative support for E-32-0105 instrument with vertical axis at Max I…
…V: overrides default based on serial number key
- Loading branch information
1 parent
0c18395
commit 66a61ba
Showing
1 changed file
with
8 additions
and
1 deletion.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
66a61ba
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nksauter for info
@jmp1985 discussion topic if this is better solution than subclassing
66a61ba
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Results from xia2:
MTZ out to dimple with PDB file gives about 25% Rwork / free => think we're OK
66a61ba
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code does process the MAX-IV Eiger 16M H5 file, yet the mechanism used is still up for debate. This commit hardcodes the vertical gonio axis (0,1,0) based on the detector serial number, yet the file actually encodes the gonio axis under the key /entry/sample/transformations/omega/vector. So shouldn't the dxtbx format reader check the serial number, and if it is E-32-0105, proceed to the keyed gonio axis?
66a61ba
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
66a61ba
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, following up now
Looked for this entry, see:
So will need to invert 'Y' anyway to have this work right... however, when I try to access this from h5py with
I get
so for reasons which are unclear this can't find the same info that h5dump can see...
66a61ba
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
66a61ba
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is attribute of group thing; got it thanks @nksauter