Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Transition to MQT QFR #29

Open
burgholzer opened this issue Apr 22, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Transition to MQT QFR #29

burgholzer opened this issue Apr 22, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
feature New feature or request

Comments

@burgholzer
Copy link
Member

At the moment, the SyReC library uses its own gate and circuit class. However, the project readily build upon our QFR library (mainly for the external dependencies). It should be rather straight-forward to replace the SyReC classes with the respective Operations (Toffoli's are just multi-controlled X gates, Fredkin gates are multi-controlled SWAP gates).

The QFR library also already features a .real file parser. At the moment this does not handle constant and garbage values properly (see cda-tum/mqt-core#88). However, this should be easy to fix.

The simulation routine should be straight-forward to adapt as well.

I also see no real obstacle for the synthesis method to be refactored to use the QFR library.

One major change considers the Python bindings. At the moment, the QFR library does not provide Python bindings for the QuantumComputation class (see cda-tum/mqt-core#89). This is most certainly required for refactoring the SyReC-editor.

It might be required to get rid of some of the Boost dependencies first (see #27), such as the dependency on boost::signal2.

@burgholzer burgholzer added the feature New feature or request label Apr 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant