-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 102
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MODULEPATH aware module-tag use #485
Comments
Could you provide an exemple setup (with initrc) to test such high loading
time?
Regards,
Xavier
Le jeu. 2 mars 2023 à 10:04, ωєиzℓєя ***@***.***> a écrit :
… The module-tag via etc/initrc has also high impact on the loading time of
modules
With 1300 modules tagged, it increases from 40ms to 120ms
This should only affect module list and module avail commands.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#485 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABFTKVN66WF2NG5EXLW26TDW2BPBBANCNFSM6AAAAAAVF4G7Q4>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Comment about performance issue has been removed so I assume this issue has been solved on your side. If you still have an issue, please open a separate ticket to distinguish from this feature request.
|
Hey, sorry for late response Would still be nice to have the module-tag accept MODULEPATH specific arguments like stated above Cheers |
Ability to specify modules with their full path file name on |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
No.
But module-tag requires not a file name but module name/alias as parameter.
Thus it is not aware of the same module name being available in a different MODULEPATH repos.
Describe the solution you'd like
Allow definition of the actual filename (as in module display)
module-tag "Patched" /root/common/modules/git/1.0
Would also be good to have the tags displayed in the module display output ,btw :)
Describe alternatives you've considered
Joining the space marines to seek out new life and new civilizations
Additional context
Tested in 5.2.0
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: