Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"shine status -L" is not so local #9

Closed
degremont opened this issue Jun 4, 2009 · 4 comments
Closed

"shine status -L" is not so local #9

degremont opened this issue Jun 4, 2009 · 4 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@degremont
Copy link
Collaborator

Shine status -L tells it did not check a lot of nodes, but it's normal, we explicit tell local mode (-L).

Resolution: I think, in local mode, it should only check target on this node.

# shine status -L
FILESYSTEM COMPONENTS STATUS (ptmp)
+-----+----+-----------------+-------------------------------+
|type | #  |     nodes       |            status             |
+-----+----+-----------------+-------------------------------+
|CLI  |129 |fortoy[7,32-159] |not checked (128), mounted (1) |
+-----+----+-----------------+-------------------------------+

Reported by: degremont

@degremont
Copy link
Collaborator Author

        milestone
            0.904 deleted

Milestone 0.904 deleted

Original comment by: degremont

@degremont
Copy link
Collaborator Author

        status
            changed from new to accepted
        
        milestone
            set to 0.904

Part of status command output remake. Keep open to follow this specific problem.

Original comment by: thiell

@degremont
Copy link
Collaborator Author

        milestone
            changed from 0.904 to 0.905

Original comment by: thiell

@degremont
Copy link
Collaborator Author

        status
            changed from accepted to closed
        
        resolution
            set to fixed

Fixe with commits SVN commit r209 and SVN commit r211.

Original comment by: degremont

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants