New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BrowserSubprocess has stopped working; Exception Code: e0000008 #2019
Comments
Are you using Windows server 2008 or 2008r2? Chromium stopped supporting vanilla 2008 quite some time back. |
I have checked, it is Windows Server 2008 R2 ... so that should be OK ? |
I now have another user with similar... again running Windows 2008 R2... Problem signature: Problem Event Name: APPCRASH Additional Information 1: 5861 http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=280262 If the online privacy statement is not available, please read our privacy statement offline: C:\Windows\system32\en-US\erofflps.txt I remain hopeful that someone can help. I switched to using this control to overcome serious memory leaks with the Microsoft browser control... the Chromium browser is far better in that regard, but now I find not 'performing' for all users... |
That doesn't really say much, could you get a symbolized stack trace? |
I would if I knew what one of those was.!.. bear in mind - these CRASh reports are from end users.. I have not been able to replicate on my development machines... so for the more technically challenged users out there... is getting a 'symbolized stack trace' an easy thing for a layperson to get...??? |
Not really, you would need to provide them with pdb files then attach a debugger to the process. |
It should be sufficient to analyse the crashdump, it's important to make sure the The fact your application runs on other computers successfully means the likelihood of this being a |
Version |
@Guido22 Were you able to obtain a symbolized stack trace? See https://bitbucket.org/chromiumembedded/cef/wiki/CrashReporting.md for configuring the new |
Alex
No – regretably, I dont have the means to do that.
The people experiencing problems are/were users... all of my testing proved successful with no errors...
Guy
From: Alex Maitland
Sent: 2 May, 2017 01:03
To: cefsharp/CefSharp
Cc: Guido22 ; Mention
Subject: Re: [cefsharp/CefSharp] BrowserSubprocess has stopped working; Exception Code: e0000008 (#2019)
@Guido22 Were you able to obtain a symbolized stack trace?
See https://bitbucket.org/chromiumembedded/cef/wiki/CrashReporting.md for configuring the new crashpad reporting feature that was recently introduced in Chromium
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
You simply need to obtain a |
FWIW, I have had users report this same error using CefSharp v55. Here is some information that was obtained from the Windows Event Viewer on two occasions:
I have been seeing this in the CEF log file as well:
Our application code, which has not changed, worked without issue using CefSharp v43 and CefSharp v53. These errors began happening after our upgrade to CefSharp v55, and continue with CefSharp v57. I am continuing to investigate on my end as well. If I find any more relevant information, I will share here. If anybody has any insight, it would be much appreciated. And to the CefSharp team, thank you for all of your hard work! Great product! |
Are you using
Whilst not directly related you should read http://www.magpcss.org/ceforum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=14130 as background on out of memory issues. Often they're javascript related, others are due to really large images. If you get a |
WinForms
Our issue does appear to be javascript related. Specifically, the BrowserSubProcess exits while our application performs a large number of Javascript calls on a Google Map, usually occurs while the Google Map is performing an animated zoom. I have noticed that, sometimes, a promise So the issue can manifest itself in any of 3 ways:
Still trying to figure which of these are the cause of the issue, vs symptoms. Like I said, our code used to work without issue, so I feel like something upstream has changed, either in CefSharp or CEF. My next steps are:
Still investigating... will report back with any new findings... any insight from others greatly appreciated! |
In relation to
You need to obtain a |
I obtained a symbolized stack trace (I think?) and posted it on ceforum. Sharing here for interested parties: |
I've upgraded For reference you can easily compare branches on Good luck! |
As per suggestion in http://magpcss.org/ceforum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=15120#p34802 it appears that setting The https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/wz223b1z.aspx The default x86 SubProcess shipped with CefSharp is large address aware and has been for quite some time, this had previously been enough. After applying the Closing this now as I don't believe it's a |
I have a VB.Net Application using Nuget Winforms : version 55.0.0
Architecture x86 / Operating System : Windows Server 2008
On this particular users machine -
the browser instance reloads a URL (same URL ie. the page address is constant) every 5minutes
retrieves HTML from the browser instance every 15 seconds....
Dim webBrowser as ChromiumWebBrowser
Dim taskHtml As Task(Of String) = webBrowser.GetBrowser.MainFrame.GetSourceAsync()
WebPageHTML = taskHtml.Result
.... and after a period of time , an exception is thrown with the message ..."CefSharp.Browser subprocess has stopped working"
Viewing the problem details reveals the following....
Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: APPCRASH
Application Name: CefSharp.BrowserSubprocess.exe
Application Version: 55.0.0.0
Application Timestamp: 589282ef
Fault Module Name: KERNELBASE.dll
Fault Module Version: 6.1.7601.18798
Fault Module Timestamp: 5507b485
Exception Code: e0000008
Exception Offset: 0000c42d
OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.272.7
Locale ID: 2057
Additional Information 1: 0a9e
Additional Information 2: 0a9e372d3b4ad19135b953a78882e789
Additional Information 3: 0a9e
Additional Information 4: 0a9e372d3b4ad19135b953a78882e789
Read our privacy statement online:
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=104288&clcid=0x0409
If the online privacy statement is not available, please read our privacy statement offline:
C:\Windows\system32\en-US\erofflps.txt
To the best of my knowledge, this is working fine on many other machines without issue.
I am unable to replicate the issue on both my Windows 2012 Server and both development machines (running Windows 10 / Windows 7).... any suggestions why this particular user is having this problem would be really appreciated , thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: