Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CEF3: Caret can sometimes be visible for more than one WebView at the same time #243

Closed
perlun opened this issue Feb 5, 2014 · 11 comments
Closed
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@perlun
Copy link
Member

perlun commented Feb 5, 2014

Discovered when fixing #242. Under similar circumstances to the scenario which triggered that bug, it can happen that the caret (text cursor) is visible in more than one WebView also at the same time, which looks very confusing to the user).

@perlun perlun closed this as completed in 55ecf77 Feb 5, 2014
@perlun perlun changed the title CEF1: Caret can sometimes be visible for more than one WebView at the same time CEF3: Caret can sometimes be visible for more than one WebView at the same time Mar 19, 2014
@perlun perlun added cef3 and removed cef1 labels Mar 19, 2014
@perlun perlun added this to the 3.29.0 milestone Mar 19, 2014
@perlun
Copy link
Member Author

perlun commented Mar 19, 2014

Rerouting towards CefSharp3, since this is something we really need to fix before we can consider the version to be stable.

@perlun perlun reopened this Mar 19, 2014
perlun added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 21, 2014
@brock8503
Copy link
Contributor

@perlun do you have an easy way to reproduce this bug?

@perlun
Copy link
Member Author

perlun commented Apr 4, 2014

Sorry, I don't. I've only seen it in a proprietary WPF-based application framework from a 3rd party vendor (with CefSharp1), so that's why we created & fixed the original issue. I can take responsibility for this one as soon as we start migrating to CefSharp version 31.x.x in our in-house product.

@perlun perlun modified the milestones: 31.1.0, 31.0.0 Apr 4, 2014
@amaitland
Copy link
Member

@perlun What's required to squash this one? 😄

@perlun
Copy link
Member Author

perlun commented Jun 2, 2014

Basically, a forward-port of 55ecf77. Shouldn't be so hard but it would be best to be able to verify that the fix works. I suggest we postpone this one a while; it doesn't have to be in for 31.0.0 to go live.

@perlun perlun modified the milestones: 31.0.1, 31.0.0 Jun 2, 2014
@amaitland
Copy link
Member

Ok no problem, will leave this one for now.

@perlun perlun self-assigned this Jun 10, 2014
@perlun
Copy link
Member Author

perlun commented Jun 10, 2014

Assigning to myself, just to make it clear that I'm intending to work on this (in a few weeks/months/whatever).

@jornh
Copy link
Contributor

jornh commented Oct 24, 2014

Hej @perlun

Just a ping to ask/tell:

Med venlige hilsner herfra
@jornh

@jornh jornh modified the milestones: xx.0.3, 33.0.2 Oct 24, 2014
@amaitland amaitland modified the milestones: xx.0.3, 37.0.0, 3000 Nov 11, 2014
@perlun
Copy link
Member Author

perlun commented Nov 12, 2014

Hej @perlun

Hejsan. 😄

Just a ping to ask/tell:

Have you guys been brave enough (and had the opportunity/reason) to move to CefSharp 3?

No, not at the moment. In fact, I've been doing very, very little .NET/C# coding at all lately (more so in Ruby). We have discussed upgrading to a later CefSharp to take advantage of x86/x64, but so far we've not been able to do it.

Inform that I'm bumping this in the https://github.com/cefsharp/CefSharp/milestones

Totally OK with me.

Otherwise, is the project moving along as you want it in general?

@amaitland
Copy link
Member

@perlun Is there any signs that this problem still exists?

@perlun
Copy link
Member Author

perlun commented Apr 10, 2015

Very unsure. We are about to roll out our updated CefSharp-based product to our two first customers at the moment (whee!) so if it is, I might find out if in a while.

I'll close it for now - will reopen as needed.

@perlun perlun closed this as completed Apr 10, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants